From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/14] ext2: replace bh_submit_read() helper with bh_read_locked() Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 02:51:07 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20220901133505.2510834-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com> <20220901133505.2510834-14-yi.zhang@huawei.com> <3fdab5fd-1efa-9668-da5c-889e9bfa1524@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.org.uk; s=zeniv-20220401; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=AHoA94Hk0V1+0HXqlkIbJPhRwQPwm6frNDZtWCI6wa4=; b=dmkbGZng4M+5yesbaSJIyzSR+G SgZbfUxTIzQOoqEgJOgYQyTbTpEmNrepfK0p5bbL7T3+4dyC50bL7mdWHuenxQfkVNiuGPWVVgzD2 XiZGRxWe+23+Lxq5+KmtXd4dgeBuM1yxgWyq6E9DpGv9YZUQ/MHtTjgPPa3VGECxozbv0Yh9vGvdi nFlmbUF1s73SuRIdGPhXlm208Z9Cj5Dyr72/rJaSqPIpigLDmmLr4BLYqMUs9z0zuEkaMgGDWdpCU SSgWvJy5sf2CjXO7IboSmtjpMkxEVrW04qP5174UeR94zvkXLDnpEdQRk/8wjIVAcrnQFbHS2l8/B Y3uRWgqg==; Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3fdab5fd-1efa-9668-da5c-889e9bfa1524@huawei.com> Sender: Al Viro List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Zhang Yi Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com, ntfs3@lists.linux.dev, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, tytso@mit.edu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, axboe@kernel.dk, rpeterso@redhat.com, agruenba@redhat.com, almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com, mark@fasheh.com, dushistov@mail.ru, hch@infradead.org, chengzhihao1@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 09:32:53AM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote: > On 2022/9/2 8:30, Al Viro wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 09:35:04PM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote: > >> bh_submit_read() and the uptodate check logic in bh_uptodate_or_lock() > >> has been integrated in bh_read() helper, so switch to use it directly. > > > > s/bh_read_locked/bh_read/ in the summary? > > > > Sorry, I don't get your question, I have already replace bh_read_locked() > with bh_read() in the commit message, there is no bh_read_locked in the whole > patch. Am I missing something? Take a look at the subject ;-)