From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 011.lax.mailroute.net (011.lax.mailroute.net [199.89.1.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4039E5632B1; Wed, 23 Sep 2026 17:05:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790183126; cv=none; b=hsiz4aepJe2U8Hz5kgCpV3NDCSBTYe3yoIK/XAh6BgKA9/n+5sF8VlWkDiH3rE91noL6ef8Ln0mCUv8HpxwlbcAzIfOesRwcG5P8/R8Kcx/nQiTogbwjJh0NxBMJ//vt8dNvzLwV6JHcPzF5IQb6KcuZyR8mo1h8JYL3aDvx1qc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790183126; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6tBxyJgxdNerK82P7vUt7sp6cimA4C0a4+ZGuOo528U=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=PpUGRH2nRUOP9AWAfsVrt2go76E8l15pe1F/IUxAU/Vzzh7+ShTcFZoJ400PPrgBLa0Qhb3osIa8oKOGxgCrqksNRqz8boYyBhh130HTK0grUGsWPOED1BSaD69oidJYSyihTgNnpfb3hThhV1FYdGcqfmN5r+uaLKrzBD9x9Io= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=UqAryOWF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="UqAryOWF" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 011.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4hqjyP0358z1XM5kW; Wed, 23 Sep 2026 17:05:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1790183108; x=1792775109; bh=6tBxyJgxdNerK82P7vUt7sp6 cimA4C0a4+ZGuOo528U=; b=UqAryOWFZpU6mEJEXF8dfeid9DYIxg+8DniRbklF Jyt5BS7qimL1gaX/th/8q9k0j1gFXwfNcXr6qyGA+CsJ6vz51ybcX8npFy2RKUB4 gdIGMekD3Ax/1Zct5HRepIi4qggs56+YKGP1vRMVee7TLckzWXI0sfh23FtuWDeo OrjDxV78mYFSWA7CoD3DlQV7V84fumu17tTlYbh4EMkEc8tlY2IbRCxbQbqbbXVV SbvhF0Q9EHkRVfENmA4BEQWHB8o9HRNBFH9Iy3rtCorj4L2rZ1e6nFfR7sBiUfUC FFRaWVYIymha+KQy4ZDu/xeFwjeC/sj8bJOLDujBb8j4wg== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 011.lax.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (011.lax [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id Oweng5elX4Wu; Wed, 23 Sep 2026 17:05:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [100.80.231.125] (unknown [104.135.182.41]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 011.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4hqjy76kWcz1XM4Sx; Wed, 23 Sep 2026 17:05:03 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <03832dd0-16bd-4fd3-a689-9f956221cc22@acm.org> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 10:05:03 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] block: Add run_todo() operation To: Tetsuo Handa , Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , Jan Kara , linux-block Cc: Al Viro , Andrew Morton , Brian Foster , Damien Le Moal , Hillf Danton , Markus Elfring , Ming Lei , Qu Wenruo , Tao Cui , kernel test robot , rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Nilay Shroff References: <24ef93b9-7385-4dda-8912-f7c78f9705d1@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 9/22/26 10:26 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > The v5 patchset passed sashiko's review. Can we apply the v5 ? That's up to Jens to decide. I think reviews from other block layer experts would make it easier for him to decide whether or not to queue this patch series. Thanks, Bart.