From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 013.lax.mailroute.net (013.lax.mailroute.net [199.89.1.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3723D391E54; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 21:07:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791234475; cv=none; b=ELPzwhMwr1VWcYc9cJVqIFAzwuPkL1GPsLnY8GrbUCAOd8B7guXBL5KHrfqaO3M/wAF0D6QPJEd3mMjelg7mWoJ6SWpivOxCXIIr/ZG3j9/k5sJFg3Z/tb5XNp93mRgksyz0ej3ONrJRKAcx8VbCSo0hZDqfMKlUwZHkrKzl9Og= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791234475; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dq4i77jwsT+0KxBL4PRHrMvUgBFxnDzVUkzdfEKqMq8=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=h3Xpg9sEs8pA8TJoy7wumdhjeB6Qs5mBykqvBe2YXOCgDdTqS5IboTzRd9O+4q+0xAZxEmQ6klD3Wsw+g4LD4edbnQ35jmwTbYQoIqCBFa/kwIWNEDFUl6I1SjvAXKxzZrkvyJwsw3QyyxQfVmP2T2225g+mhfnw4Lb4gO+qS4Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=XREvpsaQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="XREvpsaQ" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 013.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4hzBmn3sPSzlfvpN; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 21:07:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1791234466; x=1793826467; bh=dq4i77jwsT+0KxBL4PRHrMvU gBFxnDzVUkzdfEKqMq8=; b=XREvpsaQPQtzw/FDcmSo16IHxb74YV8gj12H275H 25k+DwXs5j10/zVkLUjOA22E2kQii0Za/Koz3783Aqqokyi9k0+MV0GGLo0YeEz0 Dyw3660jcGYAH3laoeFT/kZUNlvBDycdPGPiVGGl3ZP6E0UIREcEALm5u6M6xWUo XZZjdnhlvfdx0vUtxmLuFKlQWLK8W2nhmCWu960o9foPT2/Ym4QCrL9ScwwPcEB+ /Dx7Gw/y8XzhLwvxCdvBBigQhQoAyYkhjYtp1SMDChqI9MOzXWCdcm8JKcopfRGf aOsIxQg/ldNRfzOv+dntQ2wzWdsvzll4FENKjant1gONbw== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 013.lax.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (013.lax [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id tqKjfMOei0EU; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 21:07:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPV6:2a00:79e0:2ed2:d:913:466d:8f79:f68e] (unknown [104.135.182.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 013.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4hzBmX24XVzlfvpH; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 21:07:39 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <0ca00d02-9abf-4740-9dcc-05a85d88df02@acm.org> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2026 14:07:39 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] block: Add post_release() operation To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Tetsuo Handa , Jens Axboe , Jan Kara , linux-block , Al Viro , Andrew Morton , Brian Foster , Damien Le Moal , Hillf Danton , Markus Elfring , Ming Lei , Qu Wenruo , Tao Cui , kernel test robot , rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Nilay Shroff References: <69960302-1535-441a-be4e-d652766d65c2@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <472c3bcd-45d4-477b-9e81-3c68601dc18f@acm.org> <20261005084521.GA8879@lst.de> Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: <20261005084521.GA8879@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/5/26 1:45 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > No, adding magic out of lock extra ops is a no-go, and we've been > through that before. Thanks Christoph for having provided feedback. Christoph and Tetsuo, please help with reviewing the just posted version six of this patch. Bart.