From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Rahul Rameshbabu <sergeantsagara@protonmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "FUJITA Tomonori" <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
"Benno Lossin" <benno.lossin@proton.me>,
"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] rust: net::phy scope ThisModule usage in the module_phy_driver macro
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 09:14:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1c980fea-75c5-4e11-b769-b6d6967ed681@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241113174438.327414-3-sergeantsagara@protonmail.com>
On 11/13/24 18:45, Rahul Rameshbabu wrote:
> Similar to the use of $crate::Module, ThisModule should be referred to as
> $crate::ThisModule in the macro evaluation. The reason the macro previously
> did not cause any errors is because all the users of the macro would use
> kernel::prelude::*, bringing ThisModule into scope.
>
> Fixes: 2fe11d5ab35d ("rust: net::phy add module_phy_driver macro")
> Signed-off-by: Rahul Rameshbabu <sergeantsagara@protonmail.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> How I came up with this change:
>
> I was working on my own rust bindings and rust driver when I compared my
> macro_rule to the one used for module_phy_driver. I noticed, if I made a
> driver that does not use kernel::prelude::*, that the ThisModule type
> identifier used in the macro would cause an error without being scoped in
> the macro_rule. I believe the correct implementation for the macro is one
> where the types used are correctly expanded with needed scopes.
As noted by Jakub, since this apparently does not address a problem
existing in the current tree, but cleans-up the implementation for
future usage, I suggest to target the net-next without a fixes tag.
Note that net-next is currently closed for the merge window and will
re-open around Dec 2.
Thanks,
Paolo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-26 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-13 17:45 [PATCH net] rust: net::phy scope ThisModule usage in the module_phy_driver macro Rahul Rameshbabu
2024-11-25 0:27 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-11-25 0:58 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2024-11-25 8:59 ` Alice Ryhl
2024-11-26 8:14 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1c980fea-75c5-4e11-b769-b6d6967ed681@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=benno.lossin@proton.me \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@gmail.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergeantsagara@protonmail.com \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox