From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B84E1A582; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 14:56:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="0OqTOii3" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5CF77C433C7; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 14:56:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1696863409; bh=OBBS9Y7ppYPt/1t48qLHR6+TDFPlDzCneFFVnF6W1U4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=0OqTOii3eC8VOtzWzC6qGOVNsglcOQPh82q6aW3prf7ad2HzJYPTTmsB5OeDKSxee LhoeFcyogw3ipvd7s1NccTBrR3hkbpmE63uQOiH6npWV9oLmjDUx/LcQBhFY2a/gVo YBVNg4lhUKfT8t36BPD/wyeS6FnzELAlzpwdYnc8= Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 16:56:47 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Andrea Righi Cc: Miguel Ojeda , Andrew Lunn , FUJITA Tomonori , netdev@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, tmgross@umich.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/3] Rust abstractions for network PHY drivers Message-ID: <2023100901-panic-strobe-5da7@gregkh> References: <20231009013912.4048593-1-fujita.tomonori@gmail.com> <5334dc69-1604-4408-9cce-3c89bc5d7688@lunn.ch> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 04:21:09PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote: > On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 02:53:00PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 2:48 PM Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > > > > Any ideas? > > > > That is `RETHUNK` and `X86_KERNEL_IBT`. > > > > Since this will keep confusing people, I will make it a `depends on !` > > as discussed in the past. I hope it is OK for e.g. Andrea. > > Disabling RETHUNK or IBT is not acceptable for a general-purpose kernel. > If that constraint is introduced we either need to revert that patch > in the Ubuntu kernel or disable Rust support. Why is rust enabled in the Ubuntu kernel as there is no in-kernel support for any real functionality? Or do you have out-of-tree rust drivers added to your kernel already? thanks, greg k-h