rust-for-linux.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Cc: "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	"Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
	"Wedson Almeida Filho" <wedsonaf@gmail.com>,
	"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
	"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
	"Benno Lossin" <benno.lossin@proton.me>,
	"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@samsung.com>,
	"Al Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@android.com>,
	"Todd Kjos" <tkjos@android.com>,
	"Martijn Coenen" <maco@android.com>,
	"Joel Fernandes" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	"Carlos Llamas" <cmllamas@google.com>,
	"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
	"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] uaccess: always export _copy_[from|to]_user with CONFIG_RUST
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 16:15:14 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202402091606.A181673F0A@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240208-alice-mm-v2-2-d821250204a6@google.com>

On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 03:47:52PM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> Rust code needs to be able to access _copy_from_user and _copy_to_user
> so that it can skip the check_copy_size check in cases where the length
> is known at compile-time, mirroring the logic for when C code will skip
> check_copy_size. To do this, we ensure that exported versions of these
> methods are available when CONFIG_RUST is enabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/uaccess.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  lib/usercopy.c          | 30 ++++--------------------------
>  2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/uaccess.h b/include/linux/uaccess.h
> index 3064314f4832..835aa175d0ee 100644
> --- a/include/linux/uaccess.h
> +++ b/include/linux/uaccess.h
> @@ -138,13 +138,18 @@ __copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
>  	return raw_copy_to_user(to, from, n);
>  }
>  
> -#ifdef INLINE_COPY_FROM_USER
>  static inline __must_check unsigned long
> -_copy_from_user(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n)
> +_inline_copy_from_user(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n)
>  {
>  	unsigned long res = n;
>  	might_fault();
>  	if (!should_fail_usercopy() && likely(access_ok(from, n))) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Ensure that bad access_ok() speculation will not
> +		 * lead to nasty side effects *after* the copy is
> +		 * finished:
> +		 */
> +		barrier_nospec();

This means all callers just gained this barrier. That's a behavioral
change -- is it intentional here? I don't see it mentioned in the commit
log.

Also did this get tested with the CONFIG_TEST_USER_COPY tests? I would
expect it to be fine, but better to check and mention it in the commit
log.

-Kees

>  		instrument_copy_from_user_before(to, from, n);
>  		res = raw_copy_from_user(to, from, n);
>  		instrument_copy_from_user_after(to, from, n, res);
> @@ -153,14 +158,11 @@ _copy_from_user(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n)
>  		memset(to + (n - res), 0, res);
>  	return res;
>  }
> -#else
>  extern __must_check unsigned long
>  _copy_from_user(void *, const void __user *, unsigned long);
> -#endif
>  
> -#ifdef INLINE_COPY_TO_USER
>  static inline __must_check unsigned long
> -_copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
> +_inline_copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
>  {
>  	might_fault();
>  	if (should_fail_usercopy())
> @@ -171,25 +173,32 @@ _copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
>  	}
>  	return n;
>  }
> -#else
>  extern __must_check unsigned long
>  _copy_to_user(void __user *, const void *, unsigned long);
> -#endif
>  
>  static __always_inline unsigned long __must_check
>  copy_from_user(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n)
>  {
> -	if (check_copy_size(to, n, false))
> -		n = _copy_from_user(to, from, n);
> -	return n;
> +	if (!check_copy_size(to, n, false))
> +		return n;
> +#ifdef INLINE_COPY_FROM_USER
> +	return _inline_copy_from_user(to, from, n);
> +#else
> +	return _copy_from_user(to, from, n);
> +#endif
>  }
>  
>  static __always_inline unsigned long __must_check
>  copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
>  {
> -	if (check_copy_size(from, n, true))
> -		n = _copy_to_user(to, from, n);
> -	return n;
> +	if (!check_copy_size(from, n, true))
> +		return n;
> +
> +#ifdef INLINE_COPY_TO_USER
> +	return _inline_copy_to_user(to, from, n);
> +#else
> +	return _copy_to_user(to, from, n);
> +#endif
>  }
>  
>  #ifndef copy_mc_to_kernel
> diff --git a/lib/usercopy.c b/lib/usercopy.c
> index d29fe29c6849..de7f30618293 100644
> --- a/lib/usercopy.c
> +++ b/lib/usercopy.c
> @@ -7,40 +7,18 @@
>  
>  /* out-of-line parts */
>  
> -#ifndef INLINE_COPY_FROM_USER
> +#if !defined(INLINE_COPY_FROM_USER) || defined(CONFIG_RUST)
>  unsigned long _copy_from_user(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n)
>  {
> -	unsigned long res = n;
> -	might_fault();
> -	if (!should_fail_usercopy() && likely(access_ok(from, n))) {
> -		/*
> -		 * Ensure that bad access_ok() speculation will not
> -		 * lead to nasty side effects *after* the copy is
> -		 * finished:
> -		 */
> -		barrier_nospec();
> -		instrument_copy_from_user_before(to, from, n);
> -		res = raw_copy_from_user(to, from, n);
> -		instrument_copy_from_user_after(to, from, n, res);
> -	}
> -	if (unlikely(res))
> -		memset(to + (n - res), 0, res);
> -	return res;
> +	return _inline_copy_from_user(to, from, n);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(_copy_from_user);
>  #endif
>  
> -#ifndef INLINE_COPY_TO_USER
> +#if !defined(INLINE_COPY_TO_USER) || defined(CONFIG_RUST)
>  unsigned long _copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
>  {
> -	might_fault();
> -	if (should_fail_usercopy())
> -		return n;
> -	if (likely(access_ok(to, n))) {
> -		instrument_copy_to_user(to, from, n);
> -		n = raw_copy_to_user(to, from, n);
> -	}
> -	return n;
> +	return _inline_copy_to_user(to, from, n);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(_copy_to_user);
>  #endif
> 
> -- 
> 2.43.0.594.gd9cf4e227d-goog
> 

-- 
Kees Cook

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-10  0:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-08 15:47 [PATCH v2 0/4] Memory management patches needed by Rust Binder Alice Ryhl
2024-02-08 15:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] rust: uaccess: add userspace pointers Alice Ryhl
2024-02-08 22:54   ` Valentin Obst
2024-02-09 11:15     ` Alice Ryhl
2024-02-21 11:47   ` Alice Ryhl
2024-02-27 10:05   ` Carlos López
2024-02-27 13:12     ` Alice Ryhl
2024-02-08 15:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] uaccess: always export _copy_[from|to]_user with CONFIG_RUST Alice Ryhl
2024-02-08 22:56   ` Valentin Obst
2024-02-09 14:41     ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-02-09 16:45       ` Valentin Obst
2024-02-10  0:15   ` Kees Cook [this message]
2024-02-10 11:07     ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-02-14 10:51     ` Alice Ryhl
2024-02-08 15:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] rust: uaccess: add typed accessors for userspace pointers Alice Ryhl
2024-02-08 22:57   ` Valentin Obst
2024-02-09 10:40     ` Alice Ryhl
2024-02-09 17:18       ` Valentin Obst
2024-02-08 15:47 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] rust: add abstraction for `struct page` Alice Ryhl
2024-02-10  4:23   ` Martin Rodriguez Reboredo
2024-02-12  9:36     ` Alice Ryhl
2024-02-12 18:11       ` Martin Rodriguez Reboredo
2024-02-27  8:32   ` Andreas Hindborg
2024-02-27 15:37   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-02-27 15:56     ` Alice Ryhl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202402091606.A181673F0A@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=a.hindborg@samsung.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=arve@android.com \
    --cc=benno.lossin@proton.me \
    --cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cmllamas@google.com \
    --cc=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=maco@android.com \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tkjos@android.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=wedsonaf@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).