From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
Cc: rafael@kernel.org, mcgrof@kernel.org, russell.h.weight@intel.com,
ojeda@kernel.org, alex.gaynor@gmail.com, wedsonaf@gmail.com,
boqun.feng@gmail.com, gary@garyguo.net, bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com,
benno.lossin@proton.me, a.hindborg@samsung.com,
aliceryhl@google.com, airlied@gmail.com,
fujita.tomonori@gmail.com, pstanner@redhat.com,
ajanulgu@redhat.com, lyude@redhat.com,
rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] rust: add firmware abstractions
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 08:31:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024061128-provolone-coyness-1d3c@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240610180318.72152-3-dakr@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 08:02:28PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> Add an abstraction around the kernels firmware API to request firmware
> images. The abstraction provides functions to access the firmware's size
> and backing buffer.
>
> The firmware is released once the abstraction instance is dropped.
>
> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
> ---
> rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h | 1 +
> rust/kernel/firmware.rs | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> rust/kernel/lib.rs | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 109 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 rust/kernel/firmware.rs
>
> diff --git a/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h b/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h
> index ddb5644d4fd9..18a3f05115cb 100644
> --- a/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h
> +++ b/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> #include <kunit/test.h>
> #include <linux/errname.h>
> #include <linux/ethtool.h>
> +#include <linux/firmware.h>
> #include <linux/jiffies.h>
> #include <linux/mdio.h>
> #include <linux/phy.h>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/firmware.rs b/rust/kernel/firmware.rs
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7ff4c325f670
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/rust/kernel/firmware.rs
> @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +//! Firmware abstraction
> +//!
> +//! C header: [`include/linux/firmware.h`](srctree/include/linux/firmware.h")
> +
> +use crate::{bindings, device::Device, error::Error, error::Result, str::CStr};
> +use core::ptr::NonNull;
> +
> +// One of the following: `bindings::request_firmware`, `bindings::firmware_request_nowarn`,
> +// `firmware_request_platform`, `bindings::request_firmware_direct`
> +type FwFunc =
> + unsafe extern "C" fn(*mut *const bindings::firmware, *const i8, *mut bindings::device) -> i32;
> +
> +/// Abstraction around a C `struct firmware`.
> +///
> +/// This is a simple abstraction around the C firmware API. Just like with the C API, firmware can
> +/// be requested. Once requested the abstraction provides direct access to the firmware buffer as
> +/// `&[u8]`. The firmware is released once [`Firmware`] is dropped.
> +///
> +/// # Invariants
> +///
> +/// The pointer is valid, and has ownership over the instance of `struct firmware`.
> +///
> +/// # Examples
> +///
> +/// ```
> +/// use kernel::firmware::Firmware;
> +///
> +/// let fw = Firmware::request("path/to/firmware.bin", dev.as_ref())?;
> +/// driver_load_firmware(fw.data());
> +/// ```
> +pub struct Firmware(NonNull<bindings::firmware>);
> +
> +impl Firmware {
> + fn request_internal(name: &CStr, dev: &Device, func: FwFunc) -> Result<Self> {
> + let mut fw: *mut bindings::firmware = core::ptr::null_mut();
> + let pfw: *mut *mut bindings::firmware = &mut fw;
> +
> + // SAFETY: `pfw` is a valid pointer to a NULL initialized `bindings::firmware` pointer.
> + // `name` and `dev` are valid as by their type invariants.
> + let ret = unsafe { func(pfw as _, name.as_char_ptr(), dev.as_raw()) };
> + if ret != 0 {
> + return Err(Error::from_errno(ret));
> + }
> +
> + // SAFETY: `func` not bailing out with a non-zero error code, guarantees that `fw` is a
> + // valid pointer to `bindings::firmware`.
> + Ok(Firmware(unsafe { NonNull::new_unchecked(fw) }))
> + }
> +
> + /// Send a firmware request and wait for it. See also `bindings::request_firmware`.
> + pub fn request(name: &CStr, dev: &Device) -> Result<Self> {
> + Self::request_internal(name, dev, bindings::request_firmware)
> + }
How does this handle when CONFIG_FW_LOADER is not enabled? Why are you
building these bindings if that option is not checked?
> +
> + /// Send a request for an optional firmware module. See also
> + /// `bindings::firmware_request_nowarn`.
> + pub fn request_nowarn(name: &CStr, dev: &Device) -> Result<Self> {
> + Self::request_internal(name, dev, bindings::firmware_request_nowarn)
> + }
> +
> + /// Send a request for a firmware with platform-fw fallback. See also
> + /// `bindings::firmware_request_platform`.
> + pub fn request_platform(name: &CStr, dev: &Device) -> Result<Self> {
> + Self::request_internal(name, dev, bindings::firmware_request_platform)
> + }
> +
> + /// Send a request for a firmware directly without usermode helper. See also
> + /// `bindings::request_firmware_direct`.
> + pub fn request_direct(name: &CStr, dev: &Device) -> Result<Self> {
> + Self::request_internal(name, dev, bindings::request_firmware_direct)
> + }
Why just these variants? Why not just add the ones that people actually
need instead of a random assortment like you choose here :)
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-11 6:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-10 18:02 [PATCH v2 0/2] Rust abstractions for Device & Firmware Danilo Krummrich
2024-06-10 18:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rust: add abstraction for struct device Danilo Krummrich
2024-06-10 18:38 ` Boqun Feng
2024-06-11 13:21 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-06-11 13:29 ` Greg KH
2024-06-11 16:13 ` Boqun Feng
2024-06-12 13:59 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-06-12 14:51 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-06-12 15:02 ` Greg KH
2024-06-12 15:35 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-06-12 15:50 ` Greg KH
2024-06-12 16:18 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-06-12 17:13 ` Greg KH
2024-06-12 17:43 ` Greg KH
2024-06-12 20:56 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-06-13 5:47 ` Greg KH
2024-06-13 12:22 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-06-13 20:18 ` Lyude Paul
2024-06-10 18:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] rust: add firmware abstractions Danilo Krummrich
2024-06-11 6:31 ` Greg KH [this message]
2024-06-11 13:34 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-06-11 13:44 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024061128-provolone-coyness-1d3c@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=a.hindborg@samsung.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=ajanulgu@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=benno.lossin@proton.me \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@redhat.com \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@gmail.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=pstanner@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=russell.h.weight@intel.com \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wedsonaf@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).