From: Marcelo Moreira <marcelomoreira1905@gmail.com>
To: benno.lossin@proton.me, ojeda@kernel.org, aliceryhl@google.com,
rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
~lkcamp/patches@lists.sr.ht
Subject: [PATCH] rust: revocable: clarify invariants in safety documentation
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 21:57:05 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250501005726.744027-1-marcelomoreira1905@gmail.com> (raw)
Clarify the safety invariants for `Revocable<T>`, documenting that `data`
is only valid if `is_available` is `true`, and that access requires
holding the RCU read-side lock.
This helps developers understand when it is safe to access the wrapped
data and the role of RCU in ensuring memory safety.
This is part of issue #1160 ("correct safety comments and documentation
in revocable.rs"), reported by Miguel Ojeda and Benno Lossin.
Reported-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Closes: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1160
Reported-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Closes: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1160
Tested-by: Marcelo Moreira <marcelomoreira1905@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Moreira <marcelomoreira1905@gmail.com>
---
rust/kernel/revocable.rs | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/rust/kernel/revocable.rs b/rust/kernel/revocable.rs
index 1e5a9d25c21b..2da3e9460c07 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/revocable.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/revocable.rs
@@ -61,6 +61,15 @@
/// v.revoke();
/// assert_eq!(add_two(&v), None);
/// ```
+///
+/// # Invariants
+///
+/// - The wrapped object `data` is valid if and only if `is_available` is `true`.
+/// - Access to `data` must occur only while holding the RCU read-side lock (e.g., via
+/// [`Revocable::try_access`] or [`Revocable::try_access_with_guard`]).
+/// - Once `is_available` is set to `false`, further access to `data` is disallowed,
+/// and the object is dropped either after an RCU grace period (in [`revoke`]),
+/// or immediately (in [`revoke_nosync`]).
#[pin_data(PinnedDrop)]
pub struct Revocable<T> {
is_available: AtomicBool,
--
2.49.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-05-01 0:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-01 0:57 Marcelo Moreira [this message]
2025-05-01 10:18 ` [PATCH] rust: revocable: clarify invariants in safety documentation Miguel Ojeda
2025-05-02 7:33 ` Benno Lossin
2025-05-02 17:10 ` Marcelo Moreira
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250501005726.744027-1-marcelomoreira1905@gmail.com \
--to=marcelomoreira1905@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=benno.lossin@proton.me \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=~lkcamp/patches@lists.sr.ht \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox