From: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
To: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org (maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)),
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Juergen Christ <jchrist@linux.ibm.com>,
Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM64 PORT
(AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)),
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org (open list:S390 ARCHITECTURE),
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org (open list:GENERIC INCLUDE/ASM HEADER
FILES)
Subject: [RFC RESEND v10 02/14] preempt: Introduce __preempt_count_{sub, add}_return()
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 18:21:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250527222254.565881-3-lyude@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250527222254.565881-1-lyude@redhat.com>
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
In order to use preempt_count() to tracking the interrupt disable
nesting level, __preempt_count_{add,sub}_return() are introduced, as
their name suggest, these primitives return the new value of the
preempt_count() after changing it. The following example shows the usage
of it in local_interrupt_disable():
// increase the HARDIRQ_DISABLE bit
new_count = __preempt_count_add_return(HARDIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET);
// if it's the first-time increment, then disable the interrupt
// at hardware level.
if (new_count & HARDIRQ_DISABLE_MASK == HARDIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET) {
local_irq_save(flags);
raw_cpu_write(local_interrupt_disable_state.flags, flags);
}
Having these primitives will avoid a read of preempt_count() after
changing preempt_count() on certain architectures.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
---
V10:
* Add commit message I forgot
* Rebase against latest pcpu_hot changes
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h | 10 ++++++++++
include/asm-generic/preempt.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 61 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h
index 0159b625cc7f0..49cb886c8e1dd 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h
@@ -56,6 +56,24 @@ static inline void __preempt_count_sub(int val)
WRITE_ONCE(current_thread_info()->preempt.count, pc);
}
+static inline int __preempt_count_add_return(int val)
+{
+ u32 pc = READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->preempt.count);
+ pc += val;
+ WRITE_ONCE(current_thread_info()->preempt.count, pc);
+
+ return pc;
+}
+
+static inline int __preempt_count_sub_return(int val)
+{
+ u32 pc = READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->preempt.count);
+ pc -= val;
+ WRITE_ONCE(current_thread_info()->preempt.count, pc);
+
+ return pc;
+}
+
static inline bool __preempt_count_dec_and_test(void)
{
struct thread_info *ti = current_thread_info();
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h
index 6ccd033acfe52..67a6e265e9fff 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h
@@ -98,6 +98,25 @@ static __always_inline bool should_resched(int preempt_offset)
return unlikely(READ_ONCE(get_lowcore()->preempt_count) == preempt_offset);
}
+static __always_inline int __preempt_count_add_return(int val)
+{
+ /*
+ * With some obscure config options and CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES
+ * enabled, gcc 12 fails to handle __builtin_constant_p().
+ */
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES)) {
+ if (__builtin_constant_p(val) && (val >= -128) && (val <= 127)) {
+ return val + __atomic_add_const(val, &get_lowcore()->preempt_count);
+ }
+ }
+ return val + __atomic_add(val, &get_lowcore()->preempt_count);
+}
+
+static __always_inline int __preempt_count_sub_return(int val)
+{
+ return __preempt_count_add_return(-val);
+}
+
#define init_task_preempt_count(p) do { } while (0)
/* Deferred to CPU bringup time */
#define init_idle_preempt_count(p, cpu) do { } while (0)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
index 578441db09f0b..1220656f3370b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
@@ -85,6 +85,16 @@ static __always_inline void __preempt_count_sub(int val)
raw_cpu_add_4(__preempt_count, -val);
}
+static __always_inline int __preempt_count_add_return(int val)
+{
+ return raw_cpu_add_return_4(__preempt_count, val);
+}
+
+static __always_inline int __preempt_count_sub_return(int val)
+{
+ return raw_cpu_add_return_4(__preempt_count, -val);
+}
+
/*
* Because we keep PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED set when we do _not_ need to reschedule
* a decrement which hits zero means we have no preempt_count and should
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/preempt.h b/include/asm-generic/preempt.h
index 51f8f3881523a..c8683c046615d 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/preempt.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/preempt.h
@@ -59,6 +59,20 @@ static __always_inline void __preempt_count_sub(int val)
*preempt_count_ptr() -= val;
}
+static __always_inline int __preempt_count_add_return(int val)
+{
+ *preempt_count_ptr() += val;
+
+ return *preempt_count_ptr();
+}
+
+static __always_inline int __preempt_count_sub_return(int val)
+{
+ *preempt_count_ptr() -= val;
+
+ return *preempt_count_ptr();
+}
+
static __always_inline bool __preempt_count_dec_and_test(void)
{
/*
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-27 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-27 22:21 [RFC RESEND v10 00/14] Refcounted interrupts, SpinLockIrq for rust Lyude Paul
2025-05-27 22:21 ` [RFC RESEND v10 01/14] preempt: Introduce HARDIRQ_DISABLE_BITS Lyude Paul
2025-05-27 22:21 ` Lyude Paul [this message]
2025-05-28 6:37 ` [RFC RESEND v10 02/14] preempt: Introduce __preempt_count_{sub, add}_return() Heiko Carstens
2025-05-27 22:21 ` [RFC RESEND v10 03/14] irq & spin_lock: Add counted interrupt disabling/enabling Lyude Paul
2025-05-28 9:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-28 14:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-05-28 14:47 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-16 17:54 ` Joel Fernandes
2025-06-16 18:02 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-16 18:37 ` Joel Fernandes
2025-06-17 14:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-05-28 18:47 ` Lyude Paul
2025-06-16 18:10 ` Joel Fernandes
2025-06-16 18:16 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-17 14:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-06-17 14:34 ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-17 15:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-06-17 14:25 ` Boqun Feng
2025-05-27 22:21 ` [RFC RESEND v10 04/14] rust: Introduce interrupt module Lyude Paul
2025-05-29 9:21 ` Benno Lossin
2025-05-27 22:21 ` [RFC RESEND v10 05/14] rust: helper: Add spin_{un,}lock_irq_{enable,disable}() helpers Lyude Paul
2025-05-27 22:21 ` [RFC RESEND v10 06/14] rust: sync: Add SpinLockIrq Lyude Paul
2025-06-16 19:51 ` Joel Fernandes
2025-07-16 20:29 ` Lyude Paul
2025-05-27 22:21 ` [RFC RESEND v10 07/14] rust: sync: Introduce lock::Backend::Context Lyude Paul
2025-05-27 22:21 ` [RFC RESEND v10 08/14] rust: sync: lock: Add `Backend::BackendInContext` Lyude Paul
2025-05-27 22:21 ` [RFC RESEND v10 09/14] rust: sync: Add a lifetime parameter to lock::global::GlobalGuard Lyude Paul
2025-05-27 22:21 ` [RFC RESEND v10 10/14] rust: sync: lock/global: Rename B to G in trait bounds Lyude Paul
2025-05-27 22:21 ` [RFC RESEND v10 11/14] rust: sync: Expose lock::Backend Lyude Paul
2025-05-27 22:21 ` [RFC RESEND v10 12/14] rust: sync: lock/global: Add Backend parameter to GlobalGuard Lyude Paul
2025-05-27 22:21 ` [RFC RESEND v10 13/14] rust: sync: lock/global: Add BackendInContext support to GlobalLock Lyude Paul
2025-05-27 22:21 ` [RFC RESEND v10 14/14] locking: Switch to _irq_{disable,enable}() variants in cleanup guards Lyude Paul
2025-05-28 6:11 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-07-02 10:16 ` [RFC RESEND v10 00/14] Refcounted interrupts, SpinLockIrq for rust Benno Lossin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250527222254.565881-3-lyude@redhat.com \
--to=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jchrist@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).