* [PATCH v3] rust: cpufreq: Ensure C ABI compatibility in all unsafe
@ 2025-06-13 10:18 Abhinav Ananthu
2025-06-19 6:57 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-06-19 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Abhinav Ananthu @ 2025-06-13 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J . Wysocki, Viresh Kumar, Miguel Ojeda, Alex Gaynor
Cc: Boqun Feng, Gary Guo, Björn Roy Baron, Benno Lossin,
Andreas Hindborg, Alice Ryhl, Trevor Gross, Danilo Krummrich,
linux-pm, rust-for-linux, linux-kernel, Abhinav Ananthu
Update all `unsafe extern "C"` callback functions in the cpufreq module to
use `kernel::ffi` types (`c_int`, `c_uint`, etc.) instead of Rust-native
types like `i32`, `u32`, or `usize`.
This change ensures that all Rust callbacks have signatures that are
ABI-compatible with their corresponding C counterparts, which is critical
for FFI correctness and safety.
Suggested-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1170
Signed-off-by: Abhinav Ananthu <abhinav.ogl@gmail.com>
---
rust/kernel/cpufreq.rs | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rust/kernel/cpufreq.rs b/rust/kernel/cpufreq.rs
index 11b03e9d7e89..481a6d2dc362 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/cpufreq.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/cpufreq.rs
@@ -1207,8 +1207,8 @@ impl<T: Driver> Registration<T> {
/// - The pointer arguments must be valid pointers.
unsafe extern "C" fn target_callback(
ptr: *mut bindings::cpufreq_policy,
- target_freq: u32,
- relation: u32,
+ target_freq: c_uint,
+ relation: c_uint,
) -> kernel::ffi::c_int {
from_result(|| {
// SAFETY: The `ptr` is guaranteed to be valid by the contract with the C code for the
@@ -1226,7 +1226,7 @@ impl<T: Driver> Registration<T> {
/// - The pointer arguments must be valid pointers.
unsafe extern "C" fn target_index_callback(
ptr: *mut bindings::cpufreq_policy,
- index: u32,
+ index: c_uint,
) -> kernel::ffi::c_int {
from_result(|| {
// SAFETY: The `ptr` is guaranteed to be valid by the contract with the C code for the
@@ -1249,7 +1249,7 @@ impl<T: Driver> Registration<T> {
/// - The pointer arguments must be valid pointers.
unsafe extern "C" fn fast_switch_callback(
ptr: *mut bindings::cpufreq_policy,
- target_freq: u32,
+ target_freq: c_uint,
) -> kernel::ffi::c_uint {
// SAFETY: The `ptr` is guaranteed to be valid by the contract with the C code for the
// lifetime of `policy`.
@@ -1263,10 +1263,10 @@ impl<T: Driver> Registration<T> {
///
/// - This function may only be called from the cpufreq C infrastructure.
unsafe extern "C" fn adjust_perf_callback(
- cpu: u32,
- min_perf: usize,
- target_perf: usize,
- capacity: usize,
+ cpu: c_uint,
+ min_perf: c_ulong,
+ target_perf: c_ulong,
+ capacity: c_ulong,
) {
// SAFETY: The C API guarantees that `cpu` refers to a valid CPU number.
let cpu_id = unsafe { CpuId::from_u32_unchecked(cpu) };
@@ -1284,7 +1284,7 @@ impl<T: Driver> Registration<T> {
/// - The pointer arguments must be valid pointers.
unsafe extern "C" fn get_intermediate_callback(
ptr: *mut bindings::cpufreq_policy,
- index: u32,
+ index: c_uint,
) -> kernel::ffi::c_uint {
// SAFETY: The `ptr` is guaranteed to be valid by the contract with the C code for the
// lifetime of `policy`.
@@ -1305,7 +1305,7 @@ impl<T: Driver> Registration<T> {
/// - The pointer arguments must be valid pointers.
unsafe extern "C" fn target_intermediate_callback(
ptr: *mut bindings::cpufreq_policy,
- index: u32,
+ index: c_uint,
) -> kernel::ffi::c_int {
from_result(|| {
// SAFETY: The `ptr` is guaranteed to be valid by the contract with the C code for the
@@ -1325,7 +1325,7 @@ impl<T: Driver> Registration<T> {
/// # Safety
///
/// - This function may only be called from the cpufreq C infrastructure.
- unsafe extern "C" fn get_callback(cpu: u32) -> kernel::ffi::c_uint {
+ unsafe extern "C" fn get_callback(cpu: c_uint) -> kernel::ffi::c_uint {
// SAFETY: The C API guarantees that `cpu` refers to a valid CPU number.
let cpu_id = unsafe { CpuId::from_u32_unchecked(cpu) };
@@ -1351,7 +1351,7 @@ impl<T: Driver> Registration<T> {
///
/// - This function may only be called from the cpufreq C infrastructure.
/// - The pointer arguments must be valid pointers.
- unsafe extern "C" fn bios_limit_callback(cpu: i32, limit: *mut u32) -> kernel::ffi::c_int {
+ unsafe extern "C" fn bios_limit_callback(cpu: c_int, limit: *mut c_uint) -> kernel::ffi::c_int {
// SAFETY: The C API guarantees that `cpu` refers to a valid CPU number.
let cpu_id = unsafe { CpuId::from_i32_unchecked(cpu) };
@@ -1371,7 +1371,7 @@ impl<T: Driver> Registration<T> {
/// - The pointer arguments must be valid pointers.
unsafe extern "C" fn set_boost_callback(
ptr: *mut bindings::cpufreq_policy,
- state: i32,
+ state: c_int,
) -> kernel::ffi::c_int {
from_result(|| {
// SAFETY: The `ptr` is guaranteed to be valid by the contract with the C code for the
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] rust: cpufreq: Ensure C ABI compatibility in all unsafe
2025-06-13 10:18 [PATCH v3] rust: cpufreq: Ensure C ABI compatibility in all unsafe Abhinav Ananthu
@ 2025-06-19 6:57 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-06-19 7:32 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-06-19 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2025-06-19 6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Abhinav Ananthu
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki, Miguel Ojeda, Alex Gaynor, Boqun Feng,
Gary Guo, Björn Roy Baron, Benno Lossin, Andreas Hindborg,
Alice Ryhl, Trevor Gross, Danilo Krummrich, linux-pm,
rust-for-linux, linux-kernel
On 13-06-25, 15:48, Abhinav Ananthu wrote:
> Update all `unsafe extern "C"` callback functions in the cpufreq module to
> use `kernel::ffi` types (`c_int`, `c_uint`, etc.) instead of Rust-native
> types like `i32`, `u32`, or `usize`.
>
> This change ensures that all Rust callbacks have signatures that are
> ABI-compatible with their corresponding C counterparts, which is critical
> for FFI correctness and safety.
>
> Suggested-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
> Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1170
> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Ananthu <abhinav.ogl@gmail.com>
> ---
> rust/kernel/cpufreq.rs | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/cpufreq.rs b/rust/kernel/cpufreq.rs
> index 11b03e9d7e89..481a6d2dc362 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/cpufreq.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/cpufreq.rs
> @@ -1207,8 +1207,8 @@ impl<T: Driver> Registration<T> {
> /// - The pointer arguments must be valid pointers.
> unsafe extern "C" fn target_callback(
> ptr: *mut bindings::cpufreq_policy,
> - target_freq: u32,
> - relation: u32,
> + target_freq: c_uint,
> + relation: c_uint,
I think the one in prelude points to core::ffi::* instead, while we
want to use kernel::ffi::* ?
Miguel ?
Also why does prelude use ::ffi::* instead of kernel::ffi::* ? I was always a
bit confused about it.
--
viresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] rust: cpufreq: Ensure C ABI compatibility in all unsafe
2025-06-19 6:57 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2025-06-19 7:32 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-06-19 7:59 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Miguel Ojeda @ 2025-06-19 7:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Viresh Kumar
Cc: Abhinav Ananthu, Rafael J . Wysocki, Miguel Ojeda, Alex Gaynor,
Boqun Feng, Gary Guo, Björn Roy Baron, Benno Lossin,
Andreas Hindborg, Alice Ryhl, Trevor Gross, Danilo Krummrich,
linux-pm, rust-for-linux, linux-kernel
On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 8:57 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> I think the one in prelude points to core::ffi::* instead, while we
> want to use kernel::ffi::* ?
>
> Miguel ?
The one in the `kernel` prelude points to the kernel ones (the core
ones should not be used anymore).
> Also why does prelude use ::ffi::* instead of kernel::ffi::* ? I was always a
> bit confused about it.
It is because we define them in a crate called `ffi`, not in the
`kernel` one; and we also re-export it in `kernel`.
In any case, from now on, one should just refer to them directly as
`c_*` (please use the `kernel` prelude for that) -- please see:
https://docs.kernel.org/rust/coding-guidelines.html#c-ffi-types
I hope that helps!
Cheers,
Miguel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] rust: cpufreq: Ensure C ABI compatibility in all unsafe
2025-06-19 7:32 ` Miguel Ojeda
@ 2025-06-19 7:59 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2025-06-19 7:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miguel Ojeda
Cc: Abhinav Ananthu, Rafael J . Wysocki, Miguel Ojeda, Alex Gaynor,
Boqun Feng, Gary Guo, Björn Roy Baron, Benno Lossin,
Andreas Hindborg, Alice Ryhl, Trevor Gross, Danilo Krummrich,
linux-pm, rust-for-linux, linux-kernel
On 19-06-25, 09:32, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> In any case, from now on, one should just refer to them directly as
> `c_*` (please use the `kernel` prelude for that) -- please see:
>
> https://docs.kernel.org/rust/coding-guidelines.html#c-ffi-types
>
> I hope that helps!
Thanks.
--
viresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] rust: cpufreq: Ensure C ABI compatibility in all unsafe
2025-06-13 10:18 [PATCH v3] rust: cpufreq: Ensure C ABI compatibility in all unsafe Abhinav Ananthu
2025-06-19 6:57 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2025-06-19 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar
[not found] ` <CAGR7w80V_Atc_DuF1RGOFHbvXd1V2j8mMbN3yg+Q6oytiJwNbw@mail.gmail.com>
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2025-06-19 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Abhinav Ananthu
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki, Miguel Ojeda, Alex Gaynor, Boqun Feng,
Gary Guo, Björn Roy Baron, Benno Lossin, Andreas Hindborg,
Alice Ryhl, Trevor Gross, Danilo Krummrich, linux-pm,
rust-for-linux, linux-kernel
On 13-06-25, 15:48, Abhinav Ananthu wrote:
> Update all `unsafe extern "C"` callback functions in the cpufreq module to
> use `kernel::ffi` types (`c_int`, `c_uint`, etc.) instead of Rust-native
> types like `i32`, `u32`, or `usize`.
>
> This change ensures that all Rust callbacks have signatures that are
> ABI-compatible with their corresponding C counterparts, which is critical
> for FFI correctness and safety.
>
> Suggested-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
> Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1170
> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Ananthu <abhinav.ogl@gmail.com>
> ---
> rust/kernel/cpufreq.rs | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
Applied. Thanks.
There are few users of kernel::ffi::* in cpufreq.rs and opp.rs, if you want to
convert them as well.
--
viresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] rust: cpufreq: Ensure C ABI compatibility in all unsafe
[not found] ` <CAGR7w80V_Atc_DuF1RGOFHbvXd1V2j8mMbN3yg+Q6oytiJwNbw@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2025-06-19 8:40 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2025-06-19 8:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Abhinav ananthu
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki, Miguel Ojeda, Alex Gaynor, Boqun Feng,
Gary Guo, Björn Roy Baron, Benno Lossin, Andreas Hindborg,
Alice Ryhl, Trevor Gross, Danilo Krummrich, linux-pm,
rust-for-linux, linux-kernel
On 19-06-25, 14:07, Abhinav ananthu wrote:
> sure , should I make two different patches for opp.rs and cpufreq.rs or
> make the changes in a single patch?
Two patches.
--
viresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-06-19 8:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-06-13 10:18 [PATCH v3] rust: cpufreq: Ensure C ABI compatibility in all unsafe Abhinav Ananthu
2025-06-19 6:57 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-06-19 7:32 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-06-19 7:59 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-06-19 8:16 ` Viresh Kumar
[not found] ` <CAGR7w80V_Atc_DuF1RGOFHbvXd1V2j8mMbN3yg+Q6oytiJwNbw@mail.gmail.com>
2025-06-19 8:40 ` Viresh Kumar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).