From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: "Joel Fernandes" <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
"Josh Triplett" <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
"Frederic Weisbecker" <frederic@kernel.org>,
"Neeraj Upadhyay" <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Uladzislau Rezki" <urezki@gmail.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
"Lai Jiangshan" <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>, "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
"Benno Lossin" <benno.lossin@proton.me>,
"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] refscale: Add tests for local_irq_disable() vs local_interrupt_disable()
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 12:46:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202506201210.X8F6SB7c-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250619175335.2905836-1-joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Hi Joel,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on rcu/rcu/dev]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.16-rc2 next-20250619]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Joel-Fernandes/refscale-Add-tests-for-local_irq_disable-vs-local_interrupt_disable/20250620-015541
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rcu/linux.git rcu/dev
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250619175335.2905836-1-joelagnelf%40nvidia.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2] refscale: Add tests for local_irq_disable() vs local_interrupt_disable()
config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-004-20250620 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250620/202506201210.X8F6SB7c-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250620/202506201210.X8F6SB7c-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202506201210.X8F6SB7c-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
kernel/rcu/refscale.c: In function 'ref_local_interrupt_section':
>> kernel/rcu/refscale.c:533:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'local_interrupt_disable'; did you mean 'local_irq_disable'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
533 | local_interrupt_disable();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| local_irq_disable
>> kernel/rcu/refscale.c:534:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'local_interrupt_enable'; did you mean 'local_irq_enable'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
534 | local_interrupt_enable();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| local_irq_enable
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +533 kernel/rcu/refscale.c
526
527 // IRQ disable/enable tests using interrupt_disable/enable.
528 static void ref_local_interrupt_section(const int nloops)
529 {
530 int i;
531
532 for (i = nloops; i >= 0; i--) {
> 533 local_interrupt_disable();
> 534 local_interrupt_enable();
535 }
536 }
537
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-20 4:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-19 17:53 [PATCH v2] refscale: Add tests for local_irq_disable() vs local_interrupt_disable() Joel Fernandes
2025-06-20 4:46 ` kernel test robot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202506201210.X8F6SB7c-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=benno.lossin@proton.me \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).