From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from forward502d.mail.yandex.net (forward502d.mail.yandex.net [178.154.239.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D7FA1F5413; Thu, 17 Jul 2025 16:13:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.154.239.210 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752768792; cv=none; b=fH17k8pZxYNYLzaQI0OEi094zxqdS9DkPYf8ely5WaRA9GLej40gy7tx5wi1pMOK5c0s/umKIiYBZB+Vu/mGdodiJ0ReM/GkMTMlnzcENhfPUshLqesNbSyJ4ZoVss/Tvd3v94R7sygUxHSFgi6QMYxmV9Rk6D3Xjn9zrGiZkmk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752768792; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vsjhJ3z6EMjxDgXgT5LphTieOK5QpxV+BznRkq8kE8E=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Vimu3kpwFrnuutqg7pdmDATfe0px/BDko34OiEzgX7e/I75+JRqMinPzBnZa3T33833pIRrNqnv3LWvJPft5+1mDBK3sLE6pfhLxBAiOjrH+BASwH0FZtQjcGYQqt119DwYG7+SO8db8ug0BZipDK6ZuLEy6t2+pBsNzi75od8Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=onurozkan.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=onurozkan.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=onurozkan.dev header.i=@onurozkan.dev header.b=CxK6CZTb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.154.239.210 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=onurozkan.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=onurozkan.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=onurozkan.dev header.i=@onurozkan.dev header.b="CxK6CZTb" Received: from mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-78.klg.yp-c.yandex.net (mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-78.klg.yp-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c43:a3b4:0:640:7c50:0]) by forward502d.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTPS id 7991662E3A; Thu, 17 Jul 2025 19:07:19 +0300 (MSK) Received: by mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-78.klg.yp-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id E7QHDKPL70U0-sE43Ks2P; Thu, 17 Jul 2025 19:07:18 +0300 X-Yandex-Fwd: 1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=onurozkan.dev; s=mail; t=1752768438; bh=vsjhJ3z6EMjxDgXgT5LphTieOK5QpxV+BznRkq8kE8E=; h=Cc:Message-ID:Subject:Date:References:To:From:In-Reply-To; b=CxK6CZTbmXVsFLC/MApM7ePYDbXIKtmd//lEK82oAzuql1yRgcWfAp1hGsOovMOPn zthoq9LLms1UU0LBJ8F65c5CsXUHNiOy7t9/+eMRlkHkQgUWVRO7yexRkVDGJE9hB0 vOxucQ6dkbJk+tm1pYbWI97X0acnP7nwtDG3xbQk= Authentication-Results: mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-78.klg.yp-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@onurozkan.dev Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 19:07:13 +0300 From: Onur =?UTF-8?B?w5Z6a2Fu?= To: Andreas Hindborg Cc: , "Jens Korinth via B4 Relay" , "Miguel Ojeda" , "Alex Gaynor" , "Boqun Feng" , "Gary Guo" , "=?UTF-8?B?Qmo=?= =?UTF-8?B?w7Zybg==?= Roy Baron" , "Benno Lossin" , "Alice Ryhl" , "Trevor Gross" , "Rust For Linux" , "FUJITA Tomonori" , "Dirk Behme" , "Linux Kernel" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] rust: Add pr_*_once macros134 Message-ID: <20250717190713.1f19043e@nimda.home> In-Reply-To: <87o6z8h4im.fsf@kernel.org> References: <20241126-pr_once_macros-v4-0-410b8ca9643e@tuta.io> <87zfish69f.fsf@kernel.org> <87o6z8h4im.fsf@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.1 (GTK 3.24.49; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 16:42:25 +0100 Andreas Hindborg wrote: > writes: >=20 > > Hi! > > > >>=C2=A0Thanks for the patch! Do you plan on sending a new version?=C2=A0= If > >>not, do you mind if I send v5? > > > > I think there is currently no consensus on how exactly it should be > > done (or at least I was confused about that). If you=E2=80=99re actively > > using the patch please go ahead! Active usage is always the best > > argument in such cases. >=20 > I was informed this patch set is the correct way to emit a warning in > the module_params patch set [1]. >=20 > I did not follow all the discussion so I am not sure either. But I'll > look into the discussion then. >=20 >=20 > Best regards, > Andreas Hindborg >=20 >=20 >=20 > [1] > https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20250204-module-params-v3-v5-0-bf5= ec2041625@kernel.org/ >=20 >=20 I have reviewed the patch series from start to finish. I am not using or depending the patch actively but I can send v5 sometime soon (I will have some space next week) if you would like. Regards, Onur