rust-for-linux.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
To: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org (maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)),
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Juergen Christ <jchrist@linux.ibm.com>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM64 PORT
	(AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)),
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org (open list:S390 ARCHITECTURE),
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org (open list:GENERIC INCLUDE/ASM HEADER
	FILES)
Subject: [PATCH v12 02/15] preempt: Introduce __preempt_count_{sub, add}_return()
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 15:15:41 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250717191719.2076270-3-lyude@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250717191719.2076270-1-lyude@redhat.com>

From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>

In order to use preempt_count() to tracking the interrupt disable
nesting level, __preempt_count_{add,sub}_return() are introduced, as
their name suggest, these primitives return the new value of the
preempt_count() after changing it. The following example shows the usage
of it in local_interrupt_disable():

	// increase the HARDIRQ_DISABLE bit
	new_count = __preempt_count_add_return(HARDIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET);

	// if it's the first-time increment, then disable the interrupt
	// at hardware level.
	if (new_count & HARDIRQ_DISABLE_MASK == HARDIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET) {
		local_irq_save(flags);
		raw_cpu_write(local_interrupt_disable_state.flags, flags);
	}

Having these primitives will avoid a read of preempt_count() after
changing preempt_count() on certain architectures.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>

---
V10:
* Add commit message I forgot
* Rebase against latest pcpu_hot changes
V11:
* Remove CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES workaround from
  __preempt_count_add_return()

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h  | 10 ++++++++++
 arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h   | 10 ++++++++++
 include/asm-generic/preempt.h    | 14 ++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 52 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h
index 0159b625cc7f0..49cb886c8e1dd 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h
@@ -56,6 +56,24 @@ static inline void __preempt_count_sub(int val)
 	WRITE_ONCE(current_thread_info()->preempt.count, pc);
 }
 
+static inline int __preempt_count_add_return(int val)
+{
+	u32 pc = READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->preempt.count);
+	pc += val;
+	WRITE_ONCE(current_thread_info()->preempt.count, pc);
+
+	return pc;
+}
+
+static inline int __preempt_count_sub_return(int val)
+{
+	u32 pc = READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->preempt.count);
+	pc -= val;
+	WRITE_ONCE(current_thread_info()->preempt.count, pc);
+
+	return pc;
+}
+
 static inline bool __preempt_count_dec_and_test(void)
 {
 	struct thread_info *ti = current_thread_info();
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h
index 6ccd033acfe52..5ae366e26c57d 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/preempt.h
@@ -98,6 +98,16 @@ static __always_inline bool should_resched(int preempt_offset)
 	return unlikely(READ_ONCE(get_lowcore()->preempt_count) == preempt_offset);
 }
 
+static __always_inline int __preempt_count_add_return(int val)
+{
+	return val + __atomic_add(val, &get_lowcore()->preempt_count);
+}
+
+static __always_inline int __preempt_count_sub_return(int val)
+{
+	return __preempt_count_add_return(-val);
+}
+
 #define init_task_preempt_count(p)	do { } while (0)
 /* Deferred to CPU bringup time */
 #define init_idle_preempt_count(p, cpu)	do { } while (0)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
index 578441db09f0b..1220656f3370b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
@@ -85,6 +85,16 @@ static __always_inline void __preempt_count_sub(int val)
 	raw_cpu_add_4(__preempt_count, -val);
 }
 
+static __always_inline int __preempt_count_add_return(int val)
+{
+	return raw_cpu_add_return_4(__preempt_count, val);
+}
+
+static __always_inline int __preempt_count_sub_return(int val)
+{
+	return raw_cpu_add_return_4(__preempt_count, -val);
+}
+
 /*
  * Because we keep PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED set when we do _not_ need to reschedule
  * a decrement which hits zero means we have no preempt_count and should
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/preempt.h b/include/asm-generic/preempt.h
index 51f8f3881523a..c8683c046615d 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/preempt.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/preempt.h
@@ -59,6 +59,20 @@ static __always_inline void __preempt_count_sub(int val)
 	*preempt_count_ptr() -= val;
 }
 
+static __always_inline int __preempt_count_add_return(int val)
+{
+	*preempt_count_ptr() += val;
+
+	return *preempt_count_ptr();
+}
+
+static __always_inline int __preempt_count_sub_return(int val)
+{
+	*preempt_count_ptr() -= val;
+
+	return *preempt_count_ptr();
+}
+
 static __always_inline bool __preempt_count_dec_and_test(void)
 {
 	/*
-- 
2.50.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-17 19:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-17 19:15 [PATCH v12 00/15] Refcounted interrupts, SpinLockIrq for rust Lyude Paul
2025-07-17 19:15 ` [PATCH v12 01/15] preempt: Introduce HARDIRQ_DISABLE_BITS Lyude Paul
2025-07-17 19:15 ` Lyude Paul [this message]
2025-07-17 19:15 ` [PATCH v12 03/15] irq & spin_lock: Add counted interrupt disabling/enabling Lyude Paul
2025-07-17 19:15 ` [PATCH v12 04/15] irq: Add KUnit test for refcounted interrupt enable/disable Lyude Paul
2025-07-17 19:15 ` [PATCH v12 05/15] rust: Introduce interrupt module Lyude Paul
2025-07-17 19:15 ` [PATCH v12 06/15] rust: helper: Add spin_{un,}lock_irq_{enable,disable}() helpers Lyude Paul
2025-07-17 19:15 ` [PATCH v12 07/15] rust: sync: Add SpinLockIrq Lyude Paul
2025-07-17 19:15 ` [PATCH v12 08/15] rust: sync: Introduce lock::Backend::Context Lyude Paul
2025-07-17 19:15 ` [PATCH v12 09/15] rust: sync: lock: Add `Backend::BackendInContext` Lyude Paul
2025-07-17 19:15 ` [PATCH v12 10/15] rust: sync: lock/global: Rename B to G in trait bounds Lyude Paul
2025-07-17 19:15 ` [PATCH v12 11/15] rust: sync: Add a lifetime parameter to lock::global::GlobalGuard Lyude Paul
2025-07-17 19:15 ` [PATCH v12 12/15] rust: sync: Expose lock::Backend Lyude Paul
2025-07-17 19:15 ` [PATCH v12 13/15] rust: sync: lock/global: Add Backend parameter to GlobalGuard Lyude Paul
2025-07-17 19:15 ` [PATCH v12 14/15] rust: sync: lock/global: Add BackendInContext support to GlobalLock Lyude Paul
2025-07-17 19:15 ` [PATCH v12 15/15] locking: Switch to _irq_{disable,enable}() variants in cleanup guards Lyude Paul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250717191719.2076270-3-lyude@redhat.com \
    --to=lyude@redhat.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jchrist@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).