From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Asuna Yang <spriteovo@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jason Montleon" <jmontleo@redhat.com>,
"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>,
"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Albert Ou" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
"Alexandre Ghiti" <alex@ghiti.fr>,
rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: RISC-V: Re-enable GCC+Rust builds
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2025 19:17:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250830-cheesy-prone-ee5fae406c22@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <68496eed-b5a4-4739-8d84-dcc428a08e20@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1987 bytes --]
On Sat, Aug 30, 2025 at 01:00:56PM +0800, Asuna Yang wrote:
> I noticed that GCC+Rust builds for RISC-V were disabled about a year ago, as
> discussed in
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240917000848.720765-1-jmontleo@redhat.com/
>
> I'm a bit lost here. What are the main obstacles to re-enabling GCC builds
> now?
>
> Conor said:
> > Okay. Short term then is deny gcc + rust, longer term is allow it with the
> same caveats as the aforementioned mixed stuff.
> "the same caveats" means detecting what specifically?
There's "code" in the riscv Kconfig/Makefile that makes sure that the
assembler has the same understanding of what extensions are enabled as
the compiler. This is done by detecting which version of the tools are
in use, and adjusting march etc as a result. See
TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_EXPLICIT_ZICSR_ZIFENCEI for an example. When I wrote the
comment you're citing, there was no "off the shelf" way to figure out
the version of libclang in use to ensure that it has the same
understanding of -march as the version of gcc being used on the c side
does. For clang build, it's not a concern since it's almost certainly
the exact same as the compiler building the c side.
> We have a RISC-V PWM driver being written in Rust. Currently, GCC being
> disabled for building the kernel with Rust for RISC-V is the primary blocker
> for including these drivers in RISC-V distros. Therefore, I'd like to push
> forward and contribute to the re-enabling of GCC builds. Is there a more
> detailed direction on what I can do here?
Add the version of libclang as a Kconfig symbol, so that the kernel's
build system can ensure that both sides are built using the same
configuration. Off the top of my head, using a pre-17 libclang with a
new gcc would require having zicsr in -march for the c side and it
removed for rust. It's been a while (1 year+) since I fiddled with this
though, so my recollection there could well be inaccurate.
Cheers,
Conor.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-30 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-30 5:00 RISC-V: Re-enable GCC+Rust builds Asuna Yang
2025-08-30 18:17 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2025-09-01 14:08 ` Conor Dooley
2025-09-01 17:19 ` Asuna
2025-09-01 18:04 ` Conor Dooley
2025-09-03 0:59 ` Asuna
2025-09-04 11:28 ` Conor Dooley
2025-09-03 18:52 ` Asuna
[not found] ` <20250903190806.2604757-1-SpriteOvO@gmail.com>
2025-09-03 23:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] rust: get the version of libclang used by bindgen in a separate script Miguel Ojeda
2025-09-04 23:15 ` Asuna
[not found] ` <20250903190806.2604757-2-SpriteOvO@gmail.com>
2025-09-03 23:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] RISC-V: re-enable gcc + rust builds Miguel Ojeda
2025-09-04 23:17 ` Asuna
[not found] ` <20250904-sterilize-swagger-c7999b124e83@spud>
[not found] ` <f7434b76-49d0-4ef3-8c77-c1642dc211cd@gmail.com>
2025-09-04 23:07 ` Asuna
2025-09-05 15:25 ` Conor Dooley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250830-cheesy-prone-ee5fae406c22@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=jmontleo@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=spriteovo@gmail.com \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox