From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Cc: "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
"Andrey Ryabinin" <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
"Masahiro Yamada" <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
"Benno Lossin" <benno.lossin@proton.me>,
"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
"Alexander Potapenko" <glider@google.com>,
"Andrey Konovalov" <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>,
"Vincenzo Frascino" <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
"Nicolas Schier" <nicolas@fjasle.eu>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
patches@lists.linux.dev, "Matthew Maurer" <mmaurer@google.com>,
"Sami Tolvanen" <samitolvanen@google.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: kasan/kbuild: fix missing flags on first build
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 11:12:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250902-crablike-bountiful-eb1c127f024a@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aLaq6TpUtLkqHg_o@google.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6781 bytes --]
On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 08:29:29AM +0000, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 06:45:54PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > Yo,
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 12:03:11AM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> > > If KASAN is enabled, and one runs in a clean repository e.g.:
> > >
> > > make LLVM=1 prepare
> > > make LLVM=1 prepare
> > >
> > > Then the Rust code gets rebuilt, which should not happen.
> > >
> > > The reason is some of the LLVM KASAN `rustc` flags are added in the
> > > second run:
> > >
> > > -Cllvm-args=-asan-instrumentation-with-call-threshold=10000
> > > -Cllvm-args=-asan-stack=0
> > > -Cllvm-args=-asan-globals=1
> > > -Cllvm-args=-asan-kernel-mem-intrinsic-prefix=1
> > >
> > > Further runs do not rebuild Rust because the flags do not change anymore.
> > >
> > > Rebuilding like that in the second run is bad, even if this just happens
> > > with KASAN enabled, but missing flags in the first one is even worse.
> > >
> > > The root issue is that we pass, for some architectures and for the moment,
> > > a generated `target.json` file. That file is not ready by the time `rustc`
> > > gets called for the flag test, and thus the flag test fails just because
> > > the file is not available, e.g.:
> > >
> > > $ ... --target=./scripts/target.json ... -Cllvm-args=...
> > > error: target file "./scripts/target.json" does not exist
> > >
> > > There are a few approaches we could take here to solve this. For instance,
> > > we could ensure that every time that the config is rebuilt, we regenerate
> > > the file and recompute the flags. Or we could use the LLVM version to
> > > check for these flags, instead of testing the flag (which may have other
> > > advantages, such as allowing us to detect renames on the LLVM side).
> > >
> > > However, it may be easier than that: `rustc` is aware of the `-Cllvm-args`
> > > regardless of the `--target` (e.g. I checked that the list printed
> > > is the same, plus that I can check for these flags even if I pass
> > > a completely unrelated target), and thus we can just eliminate the
> > > dependency completely.
> > >
> > > Thus filter out the target.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > This does mean that `rustc-option` cannot be used to test a flag that
> > > requires the right target, but we don't have other users yet, it is a
> > > minimal change and we want to get rid of custom targets in the future.
> >
> > Hmm, while this might be true, I think it should not actually have been
> > true. Commit ca627e636551e ("rust: cfi: add support for CFI_CLANG with Rust")
> > added a cc-option check to the rust kconfig symbol, checking if the c
> > compiler supports the integer normalisations stuff:
> > depends on !CFI_CLANG || RUSTC_VERSION >= 107900 && $(cc-option,-fsanitize=kcfi -fsanitize-cfi-icall-experimental-normalize-integers)
> > and also sets the relevant options in the makefile:
> > ifdef CONFIG_RUST
> > # Always pass -Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers as CONFIG_RUST selects
> > # CONFIG_CFI_ICALL_NORMALIZE_INTEGERS.
> > RUSTC_FLAGS_CFI := -Zsanitizer=kcfi -Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers
> > KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS += $(RUSTC_FLAGS_CFI)
> > export RUSTC_FLAGS_CFI
> > endif
> > but it should also have added a rustc-option check as, unfortunately,
> > support for kcfi in rustc is target specific. This results in build
> > breakages where the arch supports CFI_CLANG and RUST, but the target in
> > use does not have the kcfi flag set.
> > I attempted to fix this by adding:
> > diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
> > index d1b4ffd6e0856..235709fb75152 100644
> > --- a/arch/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/Kconfig
> > @@ -916,6 +916,7 @@ config HAVE_CFI_ICALL_NORMALIZE_INTEGERS_CLANG
> > config HAVE_CFI_ICALL_NORMALIZE_INTEGERS_RUSTC
> > def_bool y
> > depends on HAVE_CFI_ICALL_NORMALIZE_INTEGERS_CLANG
> > + depends on $(rustc-option,-C panic=abort -Zsanitizer=kcfi -Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers)
> > depends on RUSTC_VERSION >= 107900
> > # With GCOV/KASAN we need this fix: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129373
> > depends on (RUSTC_LLVM_VERSION >= 190103 && RUSTC_VERSION >= 108200) || \
> > but of course this does not work for cross compilation, as you're
> > stripping the target information out and so the check passes on my host
> > even though my intended
> > RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=1 rustc -C panic=abort -Zsanitizer=kcfi -Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers -Ctarget-cpu=generic-rv64 --target=riscv64imac-unknown-none-elf
> > is a failure.
> >
> > I dunno too much about rustc itself, but I suspect that adding kcfi to
> > the target there is a "free" win, but that'll take time to trickle down
> > and the minimum version rustc version for the kernel isn't going to have
> > that.
> >
> > I'm not really sure what your target.json suggestion below is, so just
> > reporting so that someone that understands the alternative solutions can
> > fix this.
>
> Probably right now we have to do this cfg by
>
> depends on CONFIG_ARM
It's valid on x86 too, right?
>
> to prevent riscv if rustc has the missing setting
> set on riscv. Once we add it to riscv, we change it to
>
> depends on CONFIG_ARM || (RUSTC_VERSION >= ??? || CONFIG_RISCV)
I kinda shied away from something like this since there was already a
cc-option on the other half and checking different versions per arch
becomes a mess - but yeah it kinda is a no-brainer to do it here when
rustc-option is kinda broken.
I guess the temporary fix is then:
config HAVE_CFI_ICALL_NORMALIZE_INTEGERS_RUSTC
def_bool y
depends on HAVE_CFI_ICALL_NORMALIZE_INTEGERS_CLANG
depends on ARM64 || x86_64
depends on RUSTC_VERSION >= 107900
# With GCOV/KASAN we need this fix: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129373
depends on (RUSTC_LLVM_VERSION >= 190103 && RUSTC_VERSION >= 108200) || \
(!GCOV_KERNEL && !KASAN_GENERIC && !KASAN_SW_TAGS)
because there's no 32-bit target with SanitizerSet::KCFI in rustc either
AFAICT. Then later on it'd become more like:
config HAVE_CFI_ICALL_NORMALIZE_INTEGERS_RUSTC
def_bool y
depends on HAVE_CFI_ICALL_NORMALIZE_INTEGERS_CLANG
depends on RISCV || ((ARM64 || x86_64) && RUSTC_VERSION >= 107900)
depends on (ARM64 || x86_64) || (RISCV && RUSTC_VERSION >= 999999)
# With GCOV/KASAN we need this fix: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129373
depends on (RUSTC_LLVM_VERSION >= 190103 && RUSTC_VERSION >= 108200) || \
(!GCOV_KERNEL && !KASAN_GENERIC && !KASAN_SW_TAGS)
but that exact sort of mess is what becomes unwieldy fast since that
doesn't even cover 32-bit arm.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-02 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-08 22:03 [PATCH] rust: kasan/kbuild: fix missing flags on first build Miguel Ojeda
2025-04-09 21:35 ` Matthew Maurer
2025-04-09 21:53 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-04-13 22:24 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-04-14 11:22 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-09-01 17:45 ` Conor Dooley
2025-09-02 8:29 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-09-02 10:12 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2025-09-02 10:23 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-09-02 16:35 ` Conor Dooley
2025-09-03 9:12 ` Miguel Ojeda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250902-crablike-bountiful-eb1c127f024a@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=benno.lossin@proton.me \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=mmaurer@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas@fjasle.eu \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox