rust-for-linux.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: "Linux Doc Mailing List" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
	"Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
	"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
	"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>, "Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/19] tools/docs: sphinx-build-wrapper: add a wrapper for sphinx-build
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 22:53:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250909225308.30a42062@foz.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y0qnv4j2.fsf@trenco.lwn.net>

Em Tue, 09 Sep 2025 12:56:17 -0600
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> escreveu:

> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> writes:
> 
> > Basically, what happens is that the number of jobs can be on
> > different places:  
> 
> There is a lot of complexity there, and spread out between __init__(),
> run_sphinx(), and handle_pdf().  Is there any way to create a single
> figure_out_how_many_damn_jobs() and coalesce that logic there?  That
> would help make that part of the system a bit more comprehensible.

I'll try to better organize it, but run_sphinx() does something
different than handle_pdf():

- run_sphinx: claims all tokens;
- handle_pdf: use future.concurrent and handle parallelism inside it.

Perhaps I can move the future.concurrent parallelism to jobserver library
to simplify the code a little bit while offering an interface somewhat similar
to run_sphinx logic. Let's see if I can find a way to do it while keeping
the code generic (*).

Will take a look on it probably on Thursday of Friday.

(*) I did one similar attempt at devel time adding a subprocess call
    wrapper there, but didn't like much the solution, but this was
    before the need to use futures.concurrent.

> That said, I've been unable to make this change break in my testing.  I
> guess I'm not seeing a lot of impediments to applying the next version
> at this point.

Great! I'll probably be respinning the next (hopefully final) version
by the end of this week, if I don't get sidetracked with other things.

Thanks,
Mauro

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-09 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.1756969623.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2025-09-04  7:33 ` [PATCH v4 08/19] tools/docs: sphinx-build-wrapper: add a wrapper for sphinx-build Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-09-09 14:53   ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-09-09 15:59     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-09-09 18:56       ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-09-09 20:53         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2025-09-09 15:21   ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-09-09 16:06     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-09-10 10:46   ` Jani Nikula
2025-09-10 12:59     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-09-10 13:33       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-09-11 10:23       ` Jani Nikula
2025-09-11 11:37         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-09-11 13:38           ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-09-11 19:33             ` Jani Nikula
2025-09-11 19:47               ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-09-12  8:06                 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-09-12 10:16                   ` Jani Nikula
2025-09-12 11:34                     ` Vegard Nossum
2025-09-13 10:18                       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-09-12 11:41                     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-09-12  8:28             ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-09-04  7:33 ` [PATCH v4 09/19] tools/docs: sphinx-build-wrapper: add comments and blank lines Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-09-04  7:33 ` [PATCH v4 19/19] tools/docs: sphinx-* break documentation bulds on openSUSE Mauro Carvalho Chehab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250909225308.30a42062@foz.lan \
    --to=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
    --cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).