From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Cc: "John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
"Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>,
"Joel Fernandes" <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
"Timur Tabi" <ttabi@nvidia.com>,
"Alistair Popple" <apopple@nvidia.com>,
"Zhi Wang" <zhiw@nvidia.com>, "Surath Mitra" <smitra@nvidia.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>,
"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] rust: pci: skip probing VFs if driver doesn't support VFs
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 20:40:10 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251002234010.GI3299207@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DD85P4NV5B5Y.367RGWFHBR0RF@kernel.org>
On Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 11:32:44PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> So, when we call pdev.physfn().drvdata_borrow::<NovaCore>() the checks are
> included already.
I'm not keen on hiding this reasoning inside an physfn() accessor like
this. ie one that returns a Device<Bound>. The reasoning for this is
tricky and special. We have enough cases where physfn won't be a bound
driver. I think it is big stretch just to declare that unconditionally
safe.
There is a reason pci_iov_get_pf_drvdata() has such a big comment..
So I'd rather see you follow the C design and have an explicit helper
function to convert a VF bound device to a PF bound device and check
the owner, basically split up pci_iov_get_pf_drvdata() into a part to
get the struct device and an inline to get the drvdata. Rust still has an
ops pointer it can pass in so it can be consistent with the C code
even if it does another check inside its drvdata_borrow.
This way we keep the reasoning and explanation in one place.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-02 23:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-02 2:00 [PATCH v2 0/2] rust: pci: don't probe() VFs in nova-core John Hubbard
2025-10-02 2:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rust: pci: skip probing VFs if driver doesn't support VFs John Hubbard
2025-10-02 11:49 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-02 12:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-02 12:18 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-02 12:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-02 13:03 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-02 13:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-02 15:11 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-02 15:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-02 16:05 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-02 17:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-02 17:37 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-02 17:40 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-02 17:49 ` John Hubbard
2025-10-02 18:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-02 18:09 ` John Hubbard
2025-10-02 18:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-02 18:17 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-02 18:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-02 18:42 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-02 18:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-02 19:36 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-02 21:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-02 21:14 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-02 21:32 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-02 23:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-10-03 0:57 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-03 11:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-02 17:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-02 18:55 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-02 2:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] gpu: nova-core: declare that VFs are not (yet) supported John Hubbard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251002234010.GI3299207@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=smitra@nvidia.com \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
--cc=ttabi@nvidia.com \
--cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).