From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 801B335CBA9; Sun, 16 Nov 2025 19:38:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763321896; cv=none; b=k0wY5ufEFaIqERNisFbOLsJvMXZ+H79IYKyFZCdRTfkLin4xnFTOX2mkxDPUouZpCfnWb6xHrFkHjqzBwGs/HjEFhfBzTfRJ7jEdOl841C3RIusOtd6+pVz9EBsVjQvgKy2wzBEp82IpYa4QrU88n2gpze9X1MOj2MdCBBdd/ok= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763321896; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aDnvoRXp5jbZbWUaysTMKr6pXeOZrBDJ3a6yyM30XtY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=rbzjUbL70PytMCqgBne2lTOCPA16+QUOiHy5oSZlmk6X5O7zTvjUw/MactfLtJz5VJerJuHDuCm5DpgqjF1jTDzAHMxk8RrLTR0rgIsqtDseVfaHkGo9sgZGyhEWVZvO7Kq7jdunPUZ59buLTEZ6N8sluyjzppxOaioD3PuxEg0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=sqe+lrK5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="sqe+lrK5" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75899C4CEF1; Sun, 16 Nov 2025 19:38:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1763321896; bh=aDnvoRXp5jbZbWUaysTMKr6pXeOZrBDJ3a6yyM30XtY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=sqe+lrK5Q9WvEDBSLJsJtqJeSCpe3kjuCAAp5J9RFxBhzL+oMhNzWTVGFVdnc42im Mn5SR6lLOmZTuuSsmJ3EHWXz33qrELFXMAeKI6U3BRoi7sVU6Tk88PrxiGK3/G6IHM 1EPwZoO7VymlR1AMupWuiCoTccvgqZhup/2ez6+xxKAM4eqJbOwEJhE2YqBgRgnVE6 RYcrfAKRSHt/kxFKHQDDAZj5McYpD1ztzmUPulj8VEIePCrbldlGI0T2IXQMQor01c pF7raNtTeapjVgRytFTEivajQU5+SKKWTR+s4Ws1vEtitpTPbyoEgyu5ayubPwKGeH 0rCZeEFUJqXJA== Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2025 19:38:07 +0000 From: Conor Dooley To: Asuna Cc: Vivian Wang , Miguel Ojeda , Alex Gaynor , Boqun Feng , Gary Guo , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Roy Baron , Benno Lossin , Andreas Hindborg , Alice Ryhl , Trevor Gross , Danilo Krummrich , Jonathan Corbet , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Alexandre Ghiti , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Bill Wendling , Justin Stitt , Han Gao , Jason Montleon , rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] RISC-V: re-enable gcc + rust builds Message-ID: <20251116-axis-pouch-419f794cb1cb@spud> References: <20250914-gcc-rust-v3-v3-1-34d4d5864144@gmail.com> <73d55231-d1e5-400d-9446-1914a78c0db8@iscas.ac.cn> <0bc61e6e-8a27-4711-8ce0-60b1e300ac31@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cRVUOKC/OyDnbFeQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0bc61e6e-8a27-4711-8ce0-60b1e300ac31@gmail.com> --cRVUOKC/OyDnbFeQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 16, 2025 at 10:36:16PM +0800, Asuna wrote: > Hi everyone. Sorry I was inactive on this patch for a while. I'm getting > back into this work. >=20 > On 9/19/25 1:20 PM, Vivian Wang wrote: > > I think instead of testing libclang version, it would make more sense to > > feature test if bindgen the binary supports these flags, like what we > > already do with $(cc-option,...). > >=20 > > Same for all the other version tests. >=20 > Conor, since you've reviewed the v3 patch, do you think Vivian's suggesti= on > is a better solution? If so, I can start trying to make a v4 patch towards > that path in the next few days. >=20 I'm okay with either approach, just drop my tag if you decide to use her suggestion, and I will re-review. --cRVUOKC/OyDnbFeQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCaRooHAAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0gg8AP0bFl/forsWFyM7j0VCxtaiprWS+FBSVkAkEe6urE/eZgEAjsKFyclbZ6NS 7a6Sk1T0L3FCy8UZIMOgsZfdiKOuvQY= =/6Vf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cRVUOKC/OyDnbFeQ--