From: Zhi Wang <zhiw@nvidia.com>
To: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Cc: <rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <dakr@kernel.org>,
<aliceryhl@google.com>, <jgg@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] rust: introduce abstractions for fwctl
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 12:25:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260123122502.006a01c3.zhiw@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29a1e16a-e50b-4d69-a6fd-41d11ca9e393@nvidia.com>
On Thu, 22 Jan 2026 16:17:55 -0500
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 10:42:30PM +0200, Zhi Wang wrote:
> > + /// Called when a userspace RPC request is received.
> > + fn fw_rpc(
> > + uctx: &mut UserCtx<Self::UserCtx>,
> > + scope: u32,
> > + rpc_in: &mut [u8],
> > + out_len: *mut usize,
> > + ) -> Result<Option<KVec<u8>>, Error>;
>
> Exposing a raw pointer in the trait API means drivers that want to
> "reuse input buffer" need to write unsafe code right?
>
> unsafe { *out_len = ... };
>
> I believe the unsafe code should be confined to the abstraction layer
> instead, not in the driver.
>
> How about using using an enum return type instead to properly wrap
> inplace versus driver allocated outputs?
>
> pub enum RpcOutput {
> Allocated(KVec<u8>),
> InPlace(usize),
> }
>
> fn fw_rpc(
> uctx: &mut UserCtx<Self::UserCtx>,
> scope: u32,
> rpc_in: &mut [u8],
> ) -> Result<RpcOutput, Error>;
>
> Then the abstraction handles the pointer write:
>
> match T::fw_rpc(ctx, scope, rpc_in_slice) {
> Ok(RpcOutput::Allocated(kvec)) => {
> ...
> }
> Ok(RpcOutput::InPlace(len)) => {
> unsafe { *out_len = len };
> ...
> }
> }
>
> fw_rpc() as a bonus also gets 1 less function parameter and cleaner
> return signature.
>
This is a good idea. Noted. :)
> --
> Joel Fernandes
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-23 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-22 20:42 [PATCH v2 0/2] rust: introduce abstractions for fwctl Zhi Wang
2026-01-22 20:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Zhi Wang
2026-01-22 21:17 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-01-23 10:25 ` Zhi Wang [this message]
2026-01-26 17:48 ` Gary Guo
2026-01-27 19:59 ` Zhi Wang
2026-01-26 18:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-27 19:57 ` Zhi Wang
2026-01-27 20:07 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-28 0:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-28 1:21 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-28 13:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rust: introduce abstractions for fwctlg Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-28 14:01 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-28 14:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-28 15:49 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-28 15:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-28 16:35 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-28 16:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-28 17:26 ` Zhi Wang
2026-01-28 17:30 ` Zhi Wang
2026-01-28 17:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-28 17:40 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-28 11:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rust: introduce abstractions for fwctl Zhi Wang
2026-01-28 11:41 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-27 20:09 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-22 20:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] samples: rust: fwctl: add sample code " Zhi Wang
2026-01-22 20:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-22 21:06 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-22 21:16 ` John Hubbard
2026-01-23 10:23 ` Zhi Wang
2026-01-26 17:59 ` Gary Guo
2026-01-22 21:32 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] rust: introduce abstractions " Danilo Krummrich
2026-01-23 10:14 ` Zhi Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260123122502.006a01c3.zhiw@nvidia.com \
--to=zhiw@nvidia.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox