From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-244108.protonmail.ch (mail-244108.protonmail.ch [109.224.244.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E8DD3403F5 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2026 08:03:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=109.224.244.108 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789200209; cv=none; b=c0/XzndHogXREZzPrqwLCn+HsEccvqQa1LZxZsB6BUpBq3EeqtgVV26z9UwoB2uN6MbCiEvC7h/LNfhtxEn4fkSKlv3sbtiLsj3g+3JeeRJObvSBu3suSKeKseU8B/oLiicLL9LTcqIFI3HkHvARsGXNtca/4a+6dGRLu5Dk+wY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789200209; c=relaxed/simple; bh=teKekUbsLbZTfK8cipzX7J8A+wZqme4cswd/NEqv9mc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=X1+2jcb6B3Mqh3jKiwSTHT6PhinXwl587LDDfVtlL9JJTba6i0H1hbhUYQfcno3NUGERB4RrMEo9AC43AsfbXlNsQR8Z+muEZ50kOdfeJcj4Yud+N+WCwJUj/3KjmTiCbsj+voA+sfGKit1ft11f9Wn/QmfTrA4yC1F9p5Co+i8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=onurozkan.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=onurozkan.dev; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=onurozkan.dev header.i=@onurozkan.dev header.b=kPovIeMB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=109.224.244.108 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=onurozkan.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=onurozkan.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=onurozkan.dev header.i=@onurozkan.dev header.b="kPovIeMB" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=onurozkan.dev; s=protonmail; t=1789200205; x=1789459405; bh=kK7CQgC17BZEaNS8D1YaLCnpNWJ1hulzqUvU7kaLBmg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:From:To: Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=kPovIeMBW5V9/JqworP/bg79xmmgxWyhBUFtnle7WSBVUZM7q3jwb6GYoJzT8TtDd s8RkVjbch/6YD67SWKkC1MlZIuu37TWSWE4+UFSBnM+e+LzD0yq+uogpUos4OEkpIV YRNRg+WAuMXp1a72SH4yrVq4IYq1UdaN5DcgIBsBXoqfc+zUAmPLK5m8JAt8Fi52wb /igTf/rhVSyZzKkTTNuLOaiXRIpdlPy1GpA7rxEBPzYGkS1uRjH5CxKQiu5NCwE5D0 2Y+wPMeU7oGPdjnDxlcS5JSy54UJ/R7XhQvY9/46jt/J2U1F+jEIQejLx2cldjPivE +5O7TrUHdXflw== X-Pm-Submission-Id: 4hhkSB3vgqz2ScN7 From: =?UTF-8?q?Onur=20=C3=96zkan?= To: Daniel Almeida Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, dakr@kernel.org, aliceryhl@google.com, airlied@gmail.com, simona@ffwll.ch, ojeda@kernel.org, boqun@kernel.org, gary@garyguo.net, bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com, lossin@kernel.org, a.hindborg@kernel.org, tmgross@umich.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/tyr: unplug the GPU when reset fails Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2026 11:03:17 +0300 Message-ID: <20260912080321.78104-1-work@onurozkan.dev> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.51.2 In-Reply-To: <62D24E3D-0956-402E-8451-24FADC8D357D@collabora.com> References: <20260823-tyr-gpu-unplug-b4-v1-0-e99c07d4c785@onurozkan.dev> <20260823-tyr-gpu-unplug-b4-v1-2-e99c07d4c785@onurozkan.dev> <62D24E3D-0956-402E-8451-24FADC8D357D@collabora.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 26 Aug 2026 11:05:39 -0300=0D Daniel Almeida wrote:=0D =0D > Hi Onur,=0D > =0D > I have nothing against this patch, but as with anything touching Revocabl= e, I'd=0D > rather get Danilo's opinion here regarding revoke() and the Arc in the re= gistration.=0D > =0D > Otherwise LGTM.=0D > =0D > -- Daniel=0D =0D Before implementing this, I asked for Danilo's opinion so I believe there=0D shouldn't be significant issues with the approach from his perspective.=0D =0D But yeah, it would be great to get his feedback on the complete design.=0D =0D Onur=0D