From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>, "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Lyude Paul" <lyude@redhat.com>,
"Daniel Almeida" <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>,
"Onur Özkan" <work@onurozkan.dev>,
"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/17] preempt: Introduce HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 01:41:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a9aec78-fe1b-49c9-884f-a59eb36c8905@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804161447.84806-11-boqun@kernel.org>
Hi Boqun,
On 8/4/26 9:44 PM, Boqun Feng wrote:
> With the changes that enable preempt count to track IRQ disabling
> nesting, we don't have enough bits in 32-bit preempt count
> implementation, as a result we move NMI nesting bits out of the 32-bit
> preempt count. However on the architectures that can support 64-bit
> preempt count implementation, we can keep the NMI nesting bits in the
> 32-bit preempt count and avoid maintaining NMI nesting bits outside of
> the same cache line.
>
[...]
> --- a/include/linux/hardirq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hardirq.h
> @@ -10,8 +10,6 @@
> #include <linux/vtime.h>
> #include <asm/hardirq.h>
>
> -DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, nmi_nesting);
> -
> extern void synchronize_irq(unsigned int irq);
> extern bool synchronize_hardirq(unsigned int irq);
>
> @@ -94,6 +92,37 @@ void irq_exit_rcu(void);
> #define arch_nmi_exit() do { } while (0)
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS
> +static __always_inline void __preempt_count_nmi_enter(void)
> +{
> + __preempt_count_add(NMI_OFFSET + HARDIRQ_OFFSET);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline void __preempt_count_nmi_exit(void)
> +{
> + __preempt_count_sub(NMI_OFFSET + HARDIRQ_OFFSET);
> +}
> +#else
> +DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, nmi_nesting);
> +
> +#define __preempt_count_nmi_enter() \
> + do { \
> + __preempt_count_add(HARDIRQ_OFFSET); \
nit: This limit is because to have the same behavior as other case when
NMI_BITS=4 right?
It is not easy to infer that from comment.
> + /* Maximum NMI nesting is 15. */ \
> + BUG_ON(__this_cpu_read(nmi_nesting) >= 15); \
> + __this_cpu_inc(nmi_nesting); \
> + preempt_count_set(preempt_count() | NMI_MASK); \
Is there a reason preempt count updates are split rather than
folded into a single preempt_count update?
> + } while (0)
> +
> +#define __preempt_count_nmi_exit() \
> + do { \
> + __preempt_count_sub(HARDIRQ_OFFSET); \
> + if (!__this_cpu_dec_return(nmi_nesting)) \
> + preempt_count_set(preempt_count() & ~NMI_MASK); \
> + } while (0)
> +
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * NMI vs Tracing
> * --------------
> @@ -110,18 +139,14 @@ void irq_exit_rcu(void);
> do { \
> lockdep_off(); \
> arch_nmi_enter(); \
> - /* Maximum NMI nesting is 15. */ \
> - BUG_ON(__this_cpu_read(nmi_nesting) >= 15); \
> - __this_cpu_inc(nmi_nesting); \
> - __preempt_count_add(HARDIRQ_OFFSET); \
> - preempt_count_set(preempt_count() | NMI_MASK); \
> + __preempt_count_nmi_enter(); \
> } while (0)
>
> #define nmi_enter() \
> do { \
> __nmi_enter(); \
> lockdep_hardirq_enter(); \
> - ct_nmi_enter(); \
> + ct_nmi_enter(); \
> instrumentation_begin(); \
> ftrace_nmi_enter(); \
> instrumentation_end(); \
> @@ -129,12 +154,8 @@ void irq_exit_rcu(void);
>
> #define __nmi_exit() \
> do { \
> - unsigned int nesting; \
> BUG_ON(!in_nmi()); \
> - __preempt_count_sub(HARDIRQ_OFFSET); \
> - nesting = __this_cpu_dec_return(nmi_nesting); \
> - if (!nesting) \
> - preempt_count_set(preempt_count() & ~NMI_MASK); \
> + __preempt_count_nmi_exit(); \
> arch_nmi_exit(); \
> lockdep_on(); \
> } while (0)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-04 16:14 [PATCH v4 00/17] Refcounted interrupt disable and SpinLockIrq for Rust Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 01/17] preempt: Track NMI nesting to separate per-CPU counter Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 02/17] preempt: Introduce HARDIRQ_DISABLE_BITS Boqun Feng
2026-08-05 6:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-05 6:59 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 03/17] preempt: Introduce __preempt_count_{sub,add}_return() Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 04/17] openrisc: Include <linux/cpumask.h> in smp.h Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 05/17] irq & spin_lock: Add counted interrupt disabling/enabling Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 18:20 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 18:26 ` [PATCH v4.1 " Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 20:51 ` [PATCH v4 " Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-04 21:08 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-05 6:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-05 7:07 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-05 7:09 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-05 7:19 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-05 13:53 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-05 14:10 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-05 14:20 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-05 14:56 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-05 15:11 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-05 16:53 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-05 17:38 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-05 18:07 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 06/17] irq: Add KUnit test for refcounted interrupt enable/disable Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 07/17] locking: Switch to _irq_{disable,enable}() variants in cleanup guards Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 08/17] sched: Remove the unused preempt_offset parameter of __cant_sleep() Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 09/17] sched: Avoid signed comparison of preempt_count() in __cant_migrate() Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 10/17] preempt: Introduce HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 20:11 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2026-08-05 6:54 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-05 7:15 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-05 7:27 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-06 0:58 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 21:09 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-04 23:14 ` Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 11/17] arm64: sched/preempt: Enable HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 12/17] s390/preempt: " Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 20:27 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-05 9:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-05 12:37 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 13/17] rust: Introduce interrupt module Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 14/17] rust: helper: Add spin_{un,}lock_irq_{enable,disable}() helpers Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 15/17] rust: sync: Use super::* in spinlock.rs Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 16/17] rust: sync: Add SpinLockIrq Boqun Feng
2026-08-04 16:14 ` [PATCH v4 17/17] rust: sync: Introduce SpinLockIrq::lock_with() and friends Boqun Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2a9aec78-fe1b-49c9-884f-a59eb36c8905@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=work@onurozkan.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox