From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout-p-103.mailbox.org (mout-p-103.mailbox.org [80.241.56.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 845E71E47C8; Thu, 30 Jan 2025 13:43:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.161 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738244618; cv=none; b=eDeQPaGicGOF1WNg0RtL1erHAE0vuN6btr2OuS160JcICTgIzW0Xv/2dloUHrSOAeYY/+WiHqzR/wiFXmbCZ+mCqo3B+lCnjHYTE6GRahJ5ajDVBh+U79SMtqNn6ATNGUPRMFJy/aCBKPBwIXmU3gW885uRSbwwgOTIsIpaiTjo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738244618; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lfMC4b1zgzO5tcD9HIygOzojNEhZCfTv8yVzHUqMo9Q=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=av0u+3fd1vHZbPSjGXlT/qySTSVzis9ZbRGtxQbSjTX6oDkSd2u3TocNIiJLFiSqnNjxfIjhR/3OtgZvfQmYkocG42rBo2BotHxpdYXLngNftu7El5OLRv3GbnyQ3ohrmQvWysLp3iX8BtfwyPX42cs9YX070Bg3ja43a3vxk0I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b=Ars+vOAF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.161 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b="Ars+vOAF" Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [10.196.197.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-103.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4YkKwv2l8Tz9t9R; Thu, 30 Jan 2025 14:43:27 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1738244607; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=lfMC4b1zgzO5tcD9HIygOzojNEhZCfTv8yVzHUqMo9Q=; b=Ars+vOAFXv78op6rFVAYTnrdyPJUs+p0T1MbdRNK/9e/1KSmK6Fzc/vEUWCYDcASpalrqq O6zzxxMJLKIqrurIDQEU/EHaqLLhya0XJUuMvYN6fmfXUn9d1u6kQ5aNHp72XjZJFyd/d1 5s1i2glxhB4z24JY5k6BCPpfxc71HQgDcRNrvTMzsqE7T2XMXqrBsIh/AcT7vS8v/Ia3iw QEfc7hMQtSvxUlKVDrpYlJG+svag0Ii179ydEjs+V6jcAd/4UTnh9KFIRIEZrDr13ubLyc 5u1zsxfWMTuI2KCH9f1ZtTEPi2sPk0m7mhjVHmubbninnJ4i7ipjDRTUulc4IQ== Message-ID: <2c9a78be6b72b68b47ba869dea247e935468fa4c.camel@mailbox.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] rust: add dma coherent allocator abstraction. From: Philipp Stanner Reply-To: phasta@kernel.org To: Daniel Almeida , phasta@kernel.org Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Danilo Krummrich , Miguel Ojeda , Abdiel Janulgue , aliceryhl@google.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, Miguel Ojeda , Alex Gaynor , Boqun Feng , Gary Guo , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Roy Baron , Benno Lossin , Andreas Hindborg , Trevor Gross , Valentin Obst , open list , Marek Szyprowski , airlied@redhat.com, "open list:DMA MAPPING HELPERS" , Greg KH Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 14:43:21 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20250108122825.136021-3-abdiel.janulgue@gmail.com> <20250108135951.GA18074@lst.de> <20250108151858.GB24499@lst.de> <20250109080812.GA20431@lst.de> <20250110083955.GA5395@lst.de> <20250128092334.GA28548@lst.de> <293df3d54bad446e8fd527f204c6dc301354e340.camel@mailbox.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MBO-RS-ID: aa47e728840a1fb9d74 X-MBO-RS-META: hgbogqkcsjia3k3hm37ezizixkogbti3 On Thu, 2025-01-30 at 10:35 -0300, Daniel Almeida wrote: >=20 > >=20 > > Hallo, > >=20 > > would some sort of official statement by the "entire community" > > reassure you that the burden of keeping Rust abstractions working > > with > > any changes on the C side rests entirely on the Rust side's > > shoulders? > > (because that's what the statements made by the latter seem to mean > > to > > me) > >=20 >=20 >=20 > This has been offered over and over in this thread, i.e.: >=20 >=20 > ``` > If you don't feel comfortable maintaining the Rust abstraction (or > just don't > want to), that's fine. I don't think anyone expects you to do that, > we can take > care of that instead. > ``` >=20 > https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/Z3-NqwAG_96yq8VD@pollux/ Yup, I've read the whole thread. I was referring to the statements in those mails in my response. My thinking is that such a file is the most official, most binding statement / offer the project has. P. >=20 > Communication is not the issue here. >=20 > Also, this person waited until v8 to give a single line NAK. This is > not very nice. >=20 > =E2=80=94 Daniel