From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
tmgross@umich.edu, miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com,
benno.lossin@proton.me, wedsonaf@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] rust: core abstractions for network PHY drivers
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 14:23:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4b0759fb-88f8-4470-a8e5-094aa0b0886c@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230929.173856.1751823335892887678.fujita.tomonori@gmail.com>
> >> +/// Represents duplex mode.
> >> +pub enum DuplexMode {
> >> + /// Full-duplex mode
> >> + Half,
> >> + /// Half-duplex mode
> >> + Full,
> >> + /// Unknown
> >> + Unknown,
> >> +}
> >
> > How are these enums going to be kept in sync with the C code? This
> > doesn't seem like a good idea and will quickly cause very strange bugs
> > that will be impossible to debug :(
>
> enum DeviceState is guaranteed to be kept in sync with enum phy_state
> in C. If the C code is changed without updating the Rust code,
> compiling the Rust code fails. This is because a rustified enum is
> generated from C's phy_state enum at compile time.
>
> enum DuplexMode refers to C's defines in include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h:
>
> #define DUPLEX_HALF 0x00
> #define DUPLEX_FULL 0x01
> #define DUPLEX_UNKNOWN 0xff
>
> So we can't use the same trick. But I guess that these DUPLEX_* values
> are unlikely be changed.
I did suggest changing this into an enum. I've not tried it, but i
think it should just work.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-29 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-28 22:55 [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] Rust abstractions for network PHY drivers FUJITA Tomonori
2023-09-28 22:55 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] rust: core " FUJITA Tomonori
2023-09-29 6:03 ` Greg KH
2023-09-29 8:38 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2023-09-29 9:11 ` Trevor Gross
2023-10-02 14:08 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-10-02 16:24 ` Miguel Ojeda
2023-10-02 19:08 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-10-09 12:25 ` Miguel Ojeda
2023-10-09 15:50 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-10-09 16:16 ` Miguel Ojeda
2023-10-09 16:29 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-10-10 17:31 ` Miguel Ojeda
2023-10-02 16:37 ` Trevor Gross
2023-09-29 11:39 ` Miguel Ojeda
2023-09-29 12:23 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2023-10-01 13:08 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2023-09-29 8:50 ` Trevor Gross
2023-09-29 18:42 ` Miguel Ojeda
2023-10-10 19:19 ` Wedson Almeida Filho
2023-10-10 20:28 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-10-10 21:00 ` Wedson Almeida Filho
2023-10-10 23:34 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-10-11 1:56 ` Wedson Almeida Filho
2023-10-11 5:17 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2023-10-10 22:50 ` Trevor Gross
2023-10-10 22:53 ` Miguel Ojeda
2023-10-10 23:06 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2023-10-10 23:12 ` Trevor Gross
2023-10-11 23:57 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2023-10-12 3:09 ` Trevor Gross
2023-10-12 3:16 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2023-10-12 4:20 ` Trevor Gross
2023-10-12 15:05 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-10-11 6:56 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2023-10-11 14:28 ` Wedson Almeida Filho
2023-10-11 14:59 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2023-10-11 23:28 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2023-10-11 17:35 ` Trevor Gross
2023-09-28 22:55 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/3] MAINTAINERS: add Rust PHY abstractions to the ETHERNET PHY LIBRARY FUJITA Tomonori
2023-09-28 22:55 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/3] net: phy: add Rust Asix PHY driver FUJITA Tomonori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4b0759fb-88f8-4470-a8e5-094aa0b0886c@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=benno.lossin@proton.me \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
--cc=wedsonaf@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).