From: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Cc: "Onur Özkan" <work@onurozkan.dev>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, aliceryhl@google.com,
airlied@gmail.com, simona@ffwll.ch, ojeda@kernel.org,
boqun@kernel.org, gary@garyguo.net, bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com,
lossin@kernel.org, a.hindborg@kernel.org, tmgross@umich.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] drm/tyr: add GPU reset infrastructure
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 14:23:12 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <74217098-8793-4701-8292-FBE0DB31FD48@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DKUS768JV9RM.36WFW7QI27WKK@kernel.org>
> Why do you think it is useful to print "Starting GPU reset." and "GPU reset
> completed." with dev_info()? How does this help users or help with debugging?
>
> In general, if drivers work properly they should remain silent. A successful
> reset means it worked properly. What you rather want to print, likely with
> dev_warn() or dev_err(), is what caused the GPU reset to be performed in the
> first place.
I agree, no argument from me there. The problem is, when the GPU is resetting,
things are far from "working". In fact, things went so bad somewhere that it
brought the device down for everybody, and the system is taking steps to (try
to) bring it up again.
As a user, I very much appreciated this when games went down, it made me think
that the problem was important enough to report, and also likely explained why,
in that particular hardware, things didn't really work 100% well afterwards,
which prompted me to reboot the machine.
Two outcomes could have come from that, a) filing a bug on the game itself, and
b) telling the kernel guys that their reset code wasn't really working 100%
well either.
I do agree that "Starting GPU reset" is frivolous, but at least a message
saying that a reset took place, either sucessfully or not, is better than
silence. In fact, isn't this exactly what AMDGPU does? [2].
[2]: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.2/source/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c#L5094
> On 21 Aug 2026, at 14:01, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri Aug 21, 2026 at 6:39 PM CEST, Daniel Almeida wrote:
>> My point is that resetting the GPU should not be a “debug” trace, but rather
>> something that should hit dmesg unconditionally. Of all things that are
>> printed on a driver, a “hey the GPU is being reset because something crashed”
>> is something that should always show up IMHO.
>
> Please see my reply in [1]. If something crashed, please feel free to add a
> dev_warn() or dev_err() print about the exact error condition. But please do not
> add dev_info() prints about things that were successful and just bloat dmesg.
>
> In this specific case you want the caller of ResetHandle::schedule() to print
> about *why* the reset work was scheduled. You also already have a dev_err()
> print when the GPU reset failed. So, at this point you're good already.
I guess that also works, so long as it says that the GPU is resetting? i.e.:
it’s not only a fault or something, but also a message saying “this fault” (or
whatever it was) is causing a reset.
>
> Additional prints about when exactly the reset work starts and when it completes
> is stuff for dev_dbg().
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/DKUR5TGKTJT1.3VR0LSG4WWXJJ@kernel.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-21 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-19 18:45 [PATCH v6 0/3] drm/tyr: GPU reset infrastructure Onur Özkan
2026-08-19 18:45 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] drm/tyr: clear stale IRQ state before soft reset Onur Özkan
2026-08-19 18:45 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] drm/tyr: add GPU reset infrastructure Onur Özkan
2026-08-21 15:31 ` Daniel Almeida
2026-08-21 15:58 ` Onur Özkan
2026-08-21 16:12 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-08-21 16:39 ` Daniel Almeida
2026-08-21 16:42 ` Onur Özkan
2026-08-21 17:01 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-08-21 17:23 ` Daniel Almeida [this message]
2026-08-21 18:53 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-08-19 18:45 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] drm/tyr: put iomem behind the hardware gate Onur Özkan
2026-08-24 17:05 ` Daniel Almeida
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=74217098-8793-4701-8292-FBE0DB31FD48@collabora.com \
--to=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
--cc=work@onurozkan.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox