From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-181.mta1.migadu.com (out-181.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6441323D281 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2026 22:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.181 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776982591; cv=none; b=Fz48XYJ8FJV8pOpKcgdZaSvtRq54CVaJiuXd2hCqTcI4CbBkPBETXhWpnzFaIFGVJ9qX5Yvz/t2qb0NU/XTbAoi2zvvYyQMvdfPgqpiptMHaVKXPZbXEzhuv9RwJDGoL4vK3glVNnwU2tbqSvwnupc/P/U7HYbz93BjXwS+d6A8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776982591; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WManK8fYea5hc4U49WCTf7Pw4RApp4ZhF9zpL+ZYO58=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=fLmr72IPBDqzm0DF0fSa6p2xUKT+YOtLKLvWp/szjX9jHr9aXM75z5uGJQjhztMQyho1joHGtTjBm1Sf1eR3SzeN0lV70FU1J52GfME43i/IVLS+xbyo6dErIfWg0WEHm1Q6xnTq/+RDTaWuFEDG6hPM2lP+gpbD6G5Joueeeuw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=I5o6YFmm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.181 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="I5o6YFmm" X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1776982587; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=WManK8fYea5hc4U49WCTf7Pw4RApp4ZhF9zpL+ZYO58=; b=I5o6YFmmNan+dfYbeCVXWJBHXCilGpMhckK8LfRHCYCntNOM4dHkXLZFvNkEDJkbIQ2ODF kO/s1Jvz+emtMOogf3T+u/u1X8r66Nxiqe0nxr+GQwL5Z48gtkUz8QA0L023efRsBV5JjD HphwppyN09ERMK3Qdab/0DCG/0CROcE= From: Roman Gushchin To: John Hubbard , Miguel Ojeda Cc: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Courbot , lyude@redhat.com Subject: Re: Maybe make Sashiko emails opt-in please? In-Reply-To: <971a606f-3319-46c5-ad84-a250f8044d53@nvidia.com> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 22:16:07 +0000 Message-ID: <7ia4tst18grc.fsf@castle.c.googlers.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Hey! I'm totally happy to disable email delivery for rust-for-linux if Miguel is onboard - I generally rely on maintainers for the decision how to use Sashiko or not use at all. I have obviously zero interest in pushing it against developers will, however it's hard to achieve a full consensus on anything in a large group of people, so I have to prioritize maintainers opinion. Miguel, what do you think? I can keep you on cc, so that you will be receiving reviews, but nobody else. That would be my personal preference in this case. Otherwise: Unfortunately I can't provide Sashiko as a free service for an open set of kernel engineers, I simple don't have a big enough budget to cover associated compute costs. If there is some company which is willing to cover it, we can probably set something up via LF - Sashiko as a project belongs to LF. I try to make it easy to set up local/corporate instances and also try to make it work with any LLM providers. I personally only have access to Gemini, so I'm somewhat limited in testing here and rely on other contributors. Thanks