From: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@gmail.com>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>
Cc: "Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
"Benno Lossin" <benno.lossin@proton.me>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@samsung.com>,
rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
patches@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rust: upgrade to Rust 1.71.0
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2023 12:04:26 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <808c7eb4-abc6-21c9-f929-7070c0da1d05@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230729220317.416771-1-ojeda@kernel.org>
On 7/29/23 19:03, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> This is the second upgrade to the Rust toolchain, from 1.68.2 to 1.71.0
> (i.e. the latest).
>
> See the upgrade policy [1] and the comments on the first upgrade in
> commit 3ed03f4da06e ("rust: upgrade to Rust 1.68.2").
>
> # Unstable features
>
> No unstable features (that we use) were stabilized.
>
> Therefore, the only unstable feature allowed to be used outside
> the `kernel` crate is still `new_uninit`, though other code to be
> upstreamed may increase the list.
>
> Please see [2] for details.
>
> # Required changes
>
> For the upgrade, this patch requires the following changes:
>
> - Removal of the `__rust_*` allocator functions, together with
> the addition of the `__rust_no_alloc_shim_is_unstable` static.
> See [3] for details.
>
> - Some more compiler builtins added due to `<f{32,64}>::midpoint()`
> that got added in Rust 1.71 [4].
>
> # `alloc` upgrade and reviewing
>
> The vast majority of changes are due to our `alloc` fork being upgraded
> at once.
>
> There are two kinds of changes to be aware of: the ones coming from
> upstream, which we should follow as closely as possible, and the updates
> needed in our added fallible APIs to keep them matching the newer
> infallible APIs coming from upstream.
>
> Instead of taking a look at the diff of this patch, an alternative
> approach is reviewing a diff of the changes between upstream `alloc` and
> the kernel's. This allows to easily inspect the kernel additions only,
> especially to check if the fallible methods we already have still match
> the infallible ones in the new version coming from upstream.
>
> Another approach is reviewing the changes introduced in the additions in
> the kernel fork between the two versions. This is useful to spot
> potentially unintended changes to our additions.
>
> To apply these approaches, one may follow steps similar to the following
> to generate a pair of patches that show the differences between upstream
> Rust and the kernel (for the subset of `alloc` we use) before and after
> applying this patch:
>
> # Get the difference with respect to the old version.
> git -C rust checkout $(linux/scripts/min-tool-version.sh rustc)
> git -C linux ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD -- rust/alloc |
> cut -d/ -f3- |
> grep -Fv README.md |
> xargs -IPATH cp rust/library/alloc/src/PATH linux/rust/alloc/PATH
> git -C linux diff --patch-with-stat --summary -R > old.patch
> git -C linux restore rust/alloc
>
> # Apply this patch.
> git -C linux am rust-upgrade.patch
>
> # Get the difference with respect to the new version.
> git -C rust checkout $(linux/scripts/min-tool-version.sh rustc)
> git -C linux ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD -- rust/alloc |
> cut -d/ -f3- |
> grep -Fv README.md |
> xargs -IPATH cp rust/library/alloc/src/PATH linux/rust/alloc/PATH
> git -C linux diff --patch-with-stat --summary -R > new.patch
> git -C linux restore rust/alloc
>
> Now one may check the `new.patch` to take a look at the additions (first
> approach) or at the difference between those two patches (second
> approach). For the latter, a side-by-side tool is recommended.
>
> Link: https://rust-for-linux.com/rust-version-policy [1]
> Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/2 [2]
> Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86844 [3]
> Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/92048 [4]
> Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
> ---
> Based on top of `rust-next`, since we want to be on top of commit
> 7c74839b2acc ("rust: alloc: Add realloc and alloc_zeroed to the
> GlobalAlloc impl"), in order to be able to simply remove the `__rust_*`
> functions here.
>
> [...]
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-30 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-29 22:03 [PATCH 1/2] rust: upgrade to Rust 1.71.0 Miguel Ojeda
2023-07-29 22:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] rust: enable `no_mangle_with_rust_abi` Clippy lint Miguel Ojeda
2023-07-30 15:04 ` Martin Rodriguez Reboredo
2023-08-02 7:49 ` Trevor Gross
2023-08-02 18:26 ` Gary Guo
2023-07-29 23:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] rust: upgrade to Rust 1.71.0 kernel test robot
2023-07-30 15:04 ` Martin Rodriguez Reboredo [this message]
2023-08-02 7:43 ` Trevor Gross
2023-08-04 15:22 ` Miguel Ojeda
2023-08-14 22:40 ` Miguel Ojeda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=808c7eb4-abc6-21c9-f929-7070c0da1d05@gmail.com \
--to=yakoyoku@gmail.com \
--cc=a.hindborg@samsung.com \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=benno.lossin@proton.me \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wedsonaf@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).