Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] rust: task: add `Send` marker to `Task`

[Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com>]

On 5/23/23 11:44, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> When a type also implements `Sync`, the meaning of `Send` is just "this
> type may be accessed mutably from threads other than the one it is
> created on". That's ok for this type.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com>
> ---
> [...]
>   
> -// SAFETY: It's OK to access `Task` through references from other threads because we're either
> -// accessing properties that don't change (e.g., `pid`, `group_leader`) or that are properly
> +// SAFETY: By design, the only way to access a `Task` is via the `current` function or via an
> +// `ARef<Task>` obtained through the `AlwaysRefCounted` impl. This means that the only situation in
> +// which a `Task` can be accessed mutably is when the refcount drops to zero and the destructor
> +// runs. It is safe for that to happen on any thread, so it is ok for this type to be `Send`.
> +unsafe impl Send for Task {}
> +
> +// SAFETY: It's OK to access `Task` through shared references from other threads because we're
> +// either accessing properties that don't change (e.g., `pid`, `group_leader`) or that are properly
>   // synchronised by C code (e.g., `signal_pending`).
>   unsafe impl Sync for Task {}
>   

Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com>