From: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
To: "Malte Wechter" <maltewechter@gmail.com>,
"Brendan Higgins" <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
"David Gow" <david@davidgow.net>,
"Rae Moar" <raemoar63@gmail.com>,
"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Boqun Feng" <boqun@kernel.org>, "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Almeida" <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>,
"Tamir Duberstein" <tamird@kernel.org>,
"Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>,
"Onur Özkan" <work@onurozkan.dev>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
Malte Wechter <maltewechter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rust: kunit: add config to fail kunit tests if a lockdep warning is triggered
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 10:40:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878q5z988p.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260818-lockdep-kunit-v1-1-66ceb1a272e3@gmail.com>
"Malte Wechter" <maltewechter@gmail.com> writes:
> When running KUnit tests and a lockdep warning is triggered, the test is
> still marked as passed based only on if test assertions are true.
> Thus, add a Kconfig option CONFIG_RUST_LOCKDEP_KUNIT_DEBUG_LOCKS. When
> this option selected, if lockdep triggers during a test, fail the test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Malte Wechter <maltewechter@gmail.com>
> ---
> lib/kunit/Kconfig | 13 +++++++++++++
> rust/macros/kunit.rs | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/Kconfig b/lib/kunit/Kconfig
> index 94ff8e4089bfb..30bac00c42ce1 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/Kconfig
> +++ b/lib/kunit/Kconfig
> @@ -142,4 +142,17 @@ config KUNIT_UML_PCI
>
> If unsure, say N.
>
> +config RUST_LOCKDEP_KUNIT_DEBUG_LOCKS
> + bool "Enable extra debug_locks assertion in Rust KUnit tests"
> + depends on RUST
> + depends on LOCKDEP
> + default n
> + help
> + Adds an extra assertion to each Rust kunit test case that asserts
> + that the debug_locks flag from `lockdep` is unchanged. This is useful
> + when writing unit tests that could potentially trigger a lockdep warning,
> + this makes it so the KUnit test does not succeed if the test assertions are
> + true, but a lockdep warning is triggered.
> +
> + If unsure, say N.
> endif # KUNIT
> diff --git a/rust/macros/kunit.rs b/rust/macros/kunit.rs
> index ae20ed6768f15..d1cd0349f86f0 100644
> --- a/rust/macros/kunit.rs
> +++ b/rust/macros/kunit.rs
> @@ -144,9 +144,19 @@ macro_rules! assert_eq {
> // here to reduce the length of the assert message.
> #(#cfg_attrs)*
> {
> + #[cfg(CONFIG_RUST_LOCKDEP_KUNIT_DEBUG_LOCKS)]
> + let __debug_locks_snapshot = ::kernel::bindings::debug_locks;
Why the double underscore start?
Best regards,
Andreas Hindborg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-21 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-18 15:20 [PATCH 0/2] rust: kunit: add optional assertions to catch taint and lockdep warnings Malte Wechter
2026-08-18 15:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] rust: kunit: add config to fail kunit tests if a lockdep warning is triggered Malte Wechter
2026-08-21 8:40 ` Andreas Hindborg [this message]
2026-08-18 15:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] rust: kunit: add config to fail kunit if TAINT_WARN is set Malte Wechter
2026-08-21 9:01 ` [PATCH 0/2] rust: kunit: add optional assertions to catch taint and lockdep warnings David Gow
2026-08-21 9:03 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-08-21 10:18 ` Malte Wechter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878q5z988p.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
--cc=david@davidgow.net \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=maltewechter@gmail.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=raemoar63@gmail.com \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tamird@kernel.org \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
--cc=work@onurozkan.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox