From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-180.mta0.migadu.com (out-180.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7557F23E35F for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2026 20:24:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.180 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774038274; cv=none; b=g1N/MU++YDidOUKgm6tgM3l/MKvOx/RCFZukSKFtOpj6Vblyx/Snx/ij3UVPX9gVdrbG7r1vXk7lBfpxYv1j/0nbwZmsWW7iW30r4TvFizEprgSEhVsomPcWDab8G4TcbRrYP0LBhqgQKEHi1DJZQ/16L0sL0O7W3MVuhrOZyuU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774038274; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ez9bmjX57A284ia8toLzKVmb6ONdNpbqI4Pl6BMbs5g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=O6btVflV5Si5gt2U6MD+qotQJSqRe79gHOunRB/8XnALwVVMpH+tJOjKU86qL1YdG0c58FaOCT5iwP9c6Yw+Dfw9pEN5tFVBleIYx83mp5EHYq4H5QOJde6W+ePxczqvBG2/e30U0tRIzFDvVtIf4Edyp1ZDHJ4cWKXD2F7+Fs0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=Ey5KmEcN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.180 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="Ey5KmEcN" X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1774038270; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yaacsJbs7+53UVhkwxDkhvqyBamYYq/AMuyWT9p6SAY=; b=Ey5KmEcNYzzSZnBR7ihUZ7Qew7rU8Hhsw+kZb57/JgQynxuwEPyFVO/nhKZrO9E+59eKih CPle0NDgKJvpOkAC2tksb8xAiA3Rh4k/cIt1ltJTDcg0XiTkphJ6cHGM0NZPcroaMsDXL4 YzdVb1wgWPq5VjBgoM+XAL6AFPmXVDE= From: Roman Gushchin To: John Hubbard Cc: Miguel Ojeda , "rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org" , Alexandre Courbot , Zi Yan , Andrew Morton , Jason Gunthorpe , Leon Romanovsky , "linux-mm@kvack.org" Subject: Re: Sashiko.dev for Rust for Linux In-Reply-To: <1f94cf47-9898-405d-bdf2-29e21cd87528@nvidia.com> (John Hubbard's message of "Fri, 20 Mar 2026 12:40:51 -0700") References: <1f94cf47-9898-405d-bdf2-29e21cd87528@nvidia.com> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 13:24:24 -0700 Message-ID: <87ldfmtfk7.fsf@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT John Hubbard writes: > Hi Roman, Miguel, Hi John! > I was delighted with sashiko.dev after just a very quick peek at a > few of its linux-mm reviews. Up until now, the AI code reviewers > have often fixated on trivia, but this one goes right to real > issues that actually matter. Sweeeet! Thank you! > So what would it take to get similar results for Rust for Linux? > (A bunch of us are working on drivers/gpu/nova-core and > drivers/gpu/drm/nova, which are written in Rust.) > > I'm guessing a combination of "add rust-for-linux to the list > of mailing lists", and a whole bunch of new Rules/Skills? Yes, I'm going to add rust-for-linux (will appear ~tomorrow), but a bunch of patchsets which cc'ed lkml have already been reviewed, please, take a look. We don't need any rules/skills to get *some* reviews, but we certainly might need some prompts to get *better* reviews, both in terms of bug discovery and false positives. If you'll master something, I'm more than happy to give it a try. Thanks, Roman