From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 013.lax.mailroute.net (013.lax.mailroute.net [199.89.1.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A5863176EE; Wed, 23 Sep 2026 17:16:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790183785; cv=none; b=MmEkdzC7mpft3bH5mZTSQtw7O6WbEGT3kgI0EFmFKVrsOteMiFELcoiJlK5Tv5ua26/BqnaaYcuCzkUHMSvXr4mZrYzL65s3jICIrCb5YoUJbxfdwXLpmmKQv5DgIslaooi/7Upa3u2X8ui5OTJ0TXECtcfrPzec+T4Bh3Fz7VA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790183785; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PInkPdm778tudGb0L+eeglwtwNJE/NIxl26jezR9lh4=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=MfSGFsZUASjGpjI8C9hXOExovITXuu2SXxx6kln5OAAtHBs8YmV68nWVM+xScsZNaMYgjCJy/y+h8GVPQFgWhu4XsZS4NTTcOlYzxWZfRUpd/G674k2SWuHS55cmZTgPbYY7SRWZ5xRLjjK+TsjgudSSzRjMCwcQXlFlXYkHUjU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=MWS5cI4f; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="MWS5cI4f" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 013.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4hqkC55Tn4zlfvpH; Wed, 23 Sep 2026 17:16:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1790183770; x=1792775771; bh=gtmKrsBS2ZFYZO6zpc7l8lDV dmtntUkBhpd10++5hZo=; b=MWS5cI4fMlsJpTsA2bR623aEO26R1eX+opOAQY+j A+CZypWyjB8Dzb27KI1+o2LfNfWKFjIxCcByRwgLbV39SCpuf1p2ZlmA+4OClIiV CGrJYWIMdxYfi637lhzfJ059spt5Txj0RNP8pWZJzRnmYdPlVVWpouWNRY4+9NsZ olriukBuXmpZ2Clke2c3TZML63DjySiGUNtPnTIlpAUWe0jLSu/AtcWyVo0D68vM 3MZ2XBGNou42lSuhnqINhsK2F52XQC1sWpdXQV3Wbyz1k2cb0Jh42aHWnzdcKvxe P6oY2A4WlimQlGUPjwWgDLh9sOAZ8vPkBsBTHj3W1w72RQ== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 013.lax.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (013.lax [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id 79K4tq8AqOFX; Wed, 23 Sep 2026 17:16:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [100.80.231.125] (unknown [104.135.182.41]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 013.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4hqkBq5TMXzlfvpG; Wed, 23 Sep 2026 17:16:03 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <910e4d78-9ffa-4e17-bb8f-d4dbc7d83774@acm.org> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 10:16:02 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] loop: Perform __loop_clr_fd() from post_release callback. To: Tetsuo Handa , Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , Jan Kara , linux-block Cc: Al Viro , Andrew Morton , Brian Foster , Damien Le Moal , Hillf Danton , Markus Elfring , Ming Lei , Qu Wenruo , Tao Cui , kernel test robot , rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Nilay Shroff References: <69960302-1535-441a-be4e-d652766d65c2@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <1bced9b4-83df-4702-81ac-fc0c44baeeac@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: <1bced9b4-83df-4702-81ac-fc0c44baeeac@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 9/22/26 10:10 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > + struct task_struct *rundown_owner; This member variable probably should be renamed since the .rundown() callback has been renamed into .post_release(). Thanks, Bart.