rust-for-linux.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
	"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
	"Nick Desaulniers" <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	"Nicolas Schier" <nicolas@fjasle.eu>,
	rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	patches@lists.linux.dev, "Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
	"Wedson Almeida Filho" <wedsonaf@gmail.com>,
	"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
	"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] kbuild: rust_is_available: check if the script was invoked from Kbuild
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2023 00:12:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANiq72=Evg9pQLCdtr+kTsr4fEewjKCkBw2dBYTB7WbPVy2wtg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNARuGz=oFukWH4g=7zg1EbWP9rxpVXPgPrJBKHzLQW4N1Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 6:29 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> I do not like this.
> We do not need to cater to every oddity.
>
> Checking MAKEFLAGS is too much.

I agree we should not attempt to catch every possible mistake in the
script, but there have been several people hitting precisely this case
(the latest is in the linked thread in the commit message), i.e. some
people read the `Makefile` and notice the script invocation, and go
execute it, but they are unlikely to be aware of the target in that
case.

> You can check RUSTC/BINDGEN/CC if you persist in this.

This is fine, and actually we should do it regardless of `MAKEFLAGS`.
I can add it to v2.

However, that does not cover the same thing as `MAKEFLAGS` is trying
to here. The reason is that even if they see e.g. "RUSTC is not set",
they will not know about how to call the script properly, i.e. through
the `Makefile` target.

For `RUSTC` and `BINDGEN`, it does not really matter (and we could
give a default to the variable, since the name rarely would be
different). However, for `CC`, the logic that Kbuild uses is more
complex, so it seems best to me to let Kbuild tell us what the actual
compiler is.

Cheers,
Miguel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-13 23:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-09 20:45 [PATCH 1/6] docs: rust: add paragraph about finding a suitable `libclang` Miguel Ojeda
2023-01-09 20:45 ` [PATCH 2/6] kbuild: rust_is_available: print docs reference Miguel Ojeda
2023-01-10 10:16   ` Finn Behrens
2023-01-10 12:28     ` Miguel Ojeda
2023-01-09 20:45 ` [PATCH 3/6] kbuild: rust_is_available: add check for `bindgen` invocation Miguel Ojeda
2023-01-09 22:46   ` Boqun Feng
2023-01-09 23:27     ` Miguel Ojeda
2023-01-12  4:33   ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-01-12  4:35     ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-01-13 23:10       ` Miguel Ojeda
2023-01-14  9:44         ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-01-14 12:11           ` Miguel Ojeda
2023-01-14 12:12   ` Miguel Ojeda
2023-01-09 20:45 ` [PATCH 4/6] kbuild: rust_is_available: check if the script was invoked from Kbuild Miguel Ojeda
2023-01-12  5:28   ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-01-13 23:12     ` Miguel Ojeda [this message]
2023-01-14 12:33       ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-01-09 20:45 ` [PATCH 5/6] kbuild: rust_is_available: fix confusion when a version appears in the path Miguel Ojeda
2023-01-12  5:32   ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-01-13 23:12     ` Miguel Ojeda
2023-01-15  2:39       ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-01-13 23:30   ` Miguel Ojeda
2023-01-09 20:45 ` [PATCH 6/6] kbuild: rust_is_available: normalize version matching Miguel Ojeda
2023-01-12  6:22   ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-01-13 23:15     ` Miguel Ojeda
2023-01-15  2:48       ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-01-15 10:48         ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-01-09 20:54 ` [PATCH 1/6] docs: rust: add paragraph about finding a suitable `libclang` Nick Desaulniers
2023-01-09 21:05   ` Miguel Ojeda
2023-01-09 21:06 ` Miguel Ojeda
2023-01-12  6:04   ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-01-13 23:13     ` Miguel Ojeda
2023-01-15  2:59       ` Masahiro Yamada

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CANiq72=Evg9pQLCdtr+kTsr4fEewjKCkBw2dBYTB7WbPVy2wtg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
    --cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
    --cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=nicolas@fjasle.eu \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wedsonaf@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).