* [PATCH v2] rust: rbtree: simplify finding `current` in `remove_current`
@ 2025-07-08 7:58 Onur Özkan
2025-07-08 9:05 ` Alice Ryhl
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Onur Özkan @ 2025-07-08 7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rust-for-linux
Cc: linux-kernel, ojeda, alex.gaynor, boqun.feng, gary, bjorn3_gh,
lossin, a.hindborg, aliceryhl, tmgross, dakr, mattgilbride,
wedsonaf, daniel, tamird, Onur Özkan
The previous version used a verbose `match` to get
`current`, which may be slightly confusing at first
glance.
This change makes it shorter and more clearly expresses
the intent: prefer `next` if available, otherwise fall
back to `prev`.
Signed-off-by: Onur Özkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
---
rust/kernel/rbtree.rs | 23 +++++++----------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs b/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs
index 8d978c896747..58ad52a07c92 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs
@@ -769,23 +769,14 @@ pub fn remove_current(self) -> (Option<Self>, RBTreeNode<K, V>) {
// the tree cannot change. By the tree invariant, all nodes are valid.
unsafe { bindings::rb_erase(&mut (*this).links, addr_of_mut!(self.tree.root)) };
- let current = match (prev, next) {
- (_, Some(next)) => next,
- (Some(prev), None) => prev,
- (None, None) => {
- return (None, node);
- }
- };
+ // INVARIANT:
+ // - `current` is a valid node in the [`RBTree`] pointed to by `self.tree`.
+ let cursor = next.or(prev).map(|current| Self {
+ current,
+ tree: self.tree,
+ });
- (
- // INVARIANT:
- // - `current` is a valid node in the [`RBTree`] pointed to by `self.tree`.
- Some(Self {
- current,
- tree: self.tree,
- }),
- node,
- )
+ (cursor, node)
}
/// Remove the previous node, returning it if it exists.
--
2.50.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] rust: rbtree: simplify finding `current` in `remove_current`
2025-07-08 7:58 [PATCH v2] rust: rbtree: simplify finding `current` in `remove_current` Onur Özkan
@ 2025-07-08 9:05 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-07-08 12:51 ` Alexandre Courbot
2025-07-14 23:31 ` Miguel Ojeda
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alice Ryhl @ 2025-07-08 9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Onur Özkan
Cc: rust-for-linux, linux-kernel, ojeda, alex.gaynor, boqun.feng,
gary, bjorn3_gh, lossin, a.hindborg, tmgross, dakr, mattgilbride,
wedsonaf, daniel, tamird
On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 9:59 AM Onur Özkan <work@onurozkan.dev> wrote:
>
> The previous version used a verbose `match` to get
> `current`, which may be slightly confusing at first
> glance.
>
> This change makes it shorter and more clearly expresses
> the intent: prefer `next` if available, otherwise fall
> back to `prev`.
>
> Signed-off-by: Onur Özkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] rust: rbtree: simplify finding `current` in `remove_current`
2025-07-08 7:58 [PATCH v2] rust: rbtree: simplify finding `current` in `remove_current` Onur Özkan
2025-07-08 9:05 ` Alice Ryhl
@ 2025-07-08 12:51 ` Alexandre Courbot
2025-07-14 23:31 ` Miguel Ojeda
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Courbot @ 2025-07-08 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Onur Özkan, rust-for-linux
Cc: linux-kernel, ojeda, alex.gaynor, boqun.feng, gary, bjorn3_gh,
lossin, a.hindborg, aliceryhl, tmgross, dakr, mattgilbride,
wedsonaf, daniel, tamird
On Tue Jul 8, 2025 at 4:58 PM JST, Onur Özkan wrote:
> The previous version used a verbose `match` to get
> `current`, which may be slightly confusing at first
> glance.
>
> This change makes it shorter and more clearly expresses
> the intent: prefer `next` if available, otherwise fall
> back to `prev`.
>
> Signed-off-by: Onur Özkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Thanks, this is definitely easier to read.
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] rust: rbtree: simplify finding `current` in `remove_current`
2025-07-08 7:58 [PATCH v2] rust: rbtree: simplify finding `current` in `remove_current` Onur Özkan
2025-07-08 9:05 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-07-08 12:51 ` Alexandre Courbot
@ 2025-07-14 23:31 ` Miguel Ojeda
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Miguel Ojeda @ 2025-07-14 23:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Onur Özkan
Cc: rust-for-linux, linux-kernel, ojeda, alex.gaynor, boqun.feng,
gary, bjorn3_gh, lossin, a.hindborg, aliceryhl, tmgross, dakr,
mattgilbride, wedsonaf, daniel, tamird
On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 9:59 AM Onur Özkan <work@onurozkan.dev> wrote:
>
> The previous version used a verbose `match` to get
> `current`, which may be slightly confusing at first
> glance.
>
> This change makes it shorter and more clearly expresses
> the intent: prefer `next` if available, otherwise fall
> back to `prev`.
>
> Signed-off-by: Onur Özkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Applied to `rust-next` -- thanks everyone!
Cheers,
Miguel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-07-14 23:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-07-08 7:58 [PATCH v2] rust: rbtree: simplify finding `current` in `remove_current` Onur Özkan
2025-07-08 9:05 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-07-08 12:51 ` Alexandre Courbot
2025-07-14 23:31 ` Miguel Ojeda
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).