Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] rust: time: Rename Delta's methods as_micros_ceil and as_millis

[Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 3:17 PM Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> wrote:
>
> There are also methods such as Duration::as_millis(). Yes, those take
> &self but &self is equivalent to self for Copy types, so there is no
> difference. And even if we did treat them differently,
> Duration::as_millis() is actually borrowed->owned as the return type
> is not a reference, so ...

In most cases it may not matter, but even if taking either was exactly
the same, the point of the discussion(s) was what is more idiomatic,
i.e. how to spell those signatures.

I understand you are saying that `Duration::as_millis()` is already a
stable example from the standard library of something that is not
borrowed -> borrowed, and thus the guidelines should be understood as
implying it is fine either way. It is still confusing, as shown by
these repeated discussions, and on the parameter's side of things,
they still seem to prefer `&self`, including in the equivalent methods
of this patch.

Personally, I would use `self`, and clarify the guidelines.

Cheers,
Miguel