rust-for-linux.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@gmail.com>,
	rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,  aliceryhl@google.com,
	dakr@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 airlied@redhat.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
	 Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Introduce Owned type and Ownable trait (was: "rust: page: Add support for vmalloc_to_page")
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 11:51:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANiq72nagKRUmHWVOFGNBuiVnqdmgqPm8b6ZtG1edobmrQMr3w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zxitz41uPPeloK0o@pollux>

On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 10:03 AM Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> I wonder if it would make sense to make `CLIPPY=1` the default and only disable
> it by explicitly passing `CLIPPY=0`.

That is what I wanted, but when I asked long ago to the Clippy
maintainers if using `clippy-driver` was guaranteed to not affect
codegen, the answer was no: for instance, optimization may be affected
(at least back then), and the maintainers said the intention is that
is not to be used for normal compiling. So I sent a PR to document
that. See:

    https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/8035
    https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/8037

Similarly, Christian proposed running `rustfmtcheck` unconditionally
on build and offering a way to turn it off instead. I think that would
be ideal too, but it could potentially lead to problems too, so I am
not sure either; see e.g.:

    https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/CANiq72==AkkqCDaZMENQRg8cf4zdeHpTHwdWS3sZiFWm0vyJUA@mail.gmail.com/

So I wonder if we should instead go with a "dev mode" like `D=1` that
enables Clippy, `rustfmtcheck`, `-Dwarnings` (even if `WERROR=n` and
applying to everything, not just kernel objects,), potentially
`rustdoc`-related warnings too, and whatever other tooling/checks in
the future (e.g. klint), and not just for Rust but potentially for C
and other bits too (e.g. `W=1`, some important subset of Coccinelle
scripts...).

That way, "normal builds" (i.e. those done by users) stay as
fast/clean/warning-free/bug-free/optimized as possible even across
compiler versions, potential bugs in the toolchain, etc. And I imagine
it would be easier for newcomers, too.

Opinions welcome! I am happy to prepare an RFC, since it seems a few
people would like something like that.

Cheers,
Miguel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-23  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-22 22:44 [PATCH v2 0/5] Introduce Owned type and Ownable trait (was: "rust: page: Add support for vmalloc_to_page") Abdiel Janulgue
2024-10-22 22:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] rust: types: add `Owned` type and `Ownable` trait Abdiel Janulgue
2024-10-23  8:10   ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-10-23  9:28   ` Alice Ryhl
2024-10-23 10:26     ` Abdiel Janulgue
2024-10-23 14:58       ` Boqun Feng
2024-10-23 17:52         ` Alice Ryhl
2024-10-23 18:07           ` Boqun Feng
2024-10-24  7:23             ` Alice Ryhl
2024-10-24  7:33               ` Alice Ryhl
2024-11-01 13:38                 ` Abdiel Janulgue
2024-11-01 13:49                   ` Alice Ryhl
2024-10-22 22:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] rust: page: Make ownership of the page pointer explicit Abdiel Janulgue
2024-10-22 22:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] rust: page: Extend support to vmalloc_to_page Abdiel Janulgue
2024-10-23  8:42   ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-10-23  9:03     ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-10-23 10:26     ` Abdiel Janulgue
2024-10-23 11:30       ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-10-22 22:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] rust: page: Add page_slice_to_page Abdiel Janulgue
2024-10-22 22:44 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] rust: firmware: implement `Ownable` for Firmware Abdiel Janulgue
2024-10-23  9:35   ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-10-23  9:45     ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-10-27 22:20     ` Boqun Feng
2024-10-28 13:37       ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-10-23  8:03 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Introduce Owned type and Ownable trait (was: "rust: page: Add support for vmalloc_to_page") Danilo Krummrich
2024-10-23  9:51   ` Miguel Ojeda [this message]
2024-10-23 12:01     ` Danilo Krummrich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANiq72nagKRUmHWVOFGNBuiVnqdmgqPm8b6ZtG1edobmrQMr3w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
    --cc=abdiel.janulgue@gmail.com \
    --cc=airlied@redhat.com \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dakr@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).