* [PATCH v3 0/3] Additional improvements for dma coherent allocator
@ 2025-04-25 7:35 Abdiel Janulgue
2025-04-25 7:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] rust: dma: clarify wording and be consistent in `coherent` nomenclature Abdiel Janulgue
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Abdiel Janulgue @ 2025-04-25 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dakr, rust-for-linux
Cc: Miguel Ojeda, Alex Gaynor, Boqun Feng, Gary Guo,
Björn Roy Baron, Benno Lossin, Andreas Hindborg, Alice Ryhl,
Trevor Gross, Valentin Obst, open list, Marek Szyprowski,
Robin Murphy, airlied, open list:DMA MAPPING HELPERS,
Abdiel Janulgue
Changes since v2:
- Rebase update, add fix from Alexandre Courbot, commit clarifications,
minor sample driver improvements in error handling.
Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250410085916.546511-1-abdiel.janulgue@gmail.com/
Changes since v1:
- Pull in reviewed-by tags and include links.
- Improve error handling in rust dma sample driver.
- Clarifications in documentation.
Abdiel Janulgue (3):
rust: dma: clarify wording and be consistent in `coherent`
nomenclature
rust: dma: convert the read/write macros to return Result
rust: dma: add as_slice/write functions for CoherentAllocation
rust/kernel/dma.rs | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
samples/rust/rust_dma.rs | 28 ++++----
2 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
base-commit: 9d7a0577c9db35c4cc52db90bc415ea248446472
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 1/3] rust: dma: clarify wording and be consistent in `coherent` nomenclature
2025-04-25 7:35 [PATCH v3 0/3] Additional improvements for dma coherent allocator Abdiel Janulgue
@ 2025-04-25 7:35 ` Abdiel Janulgue
2025-04-25 7:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] rust: dma: convert the read/write macros to return Result Abdiel Janulgue
2025-04-25 7:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] rust: dma: add as_slice/write functions for CoherentAllocation Abdiel Janulgue
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Abdiel Janulgue @ 2025-04-25 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dakr, rust-for-linux
Cc: Miguel Ojeda, Alex Gaynor, Boqun Feng, Gary Guo,
Björn Roy Baron, Benno Lossin, Andreas Hindborg, Alice Ryhl,
Trevor Gross, Valentin Obst, open list, Marek Szyprowski,
Robin Murphy, airlied, open list:DMA MAPPING HELPERS,
Abdiel Janulgue
In the kernel, `consistent` and `coherent` are used interchangeably for the
region described in this api. Stick with `coherent` nomenclature
to show that dma_alloc_coherent() is being used, in addition to improving
the clarity in the DMA mapping attributes documentation.
Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@gmail.com>
---
rust/kernel/dma.rs | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rust/kernel/dma.rs b/rust/kernel/dma.rs
index 8cdc76043ee7..d3f448868457 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/dma.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/dma.rs
@@ -89,15 +89,15 @@ pub mod attrs {
/// Forces contiguous allocation of the buffer in physical memory.
pub const DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS: Attrs = Attrs(bindings::DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS);
- /// This is a hint to the DMA-mapping subsystem that it's probably not worth the time to try
+ /// Hints DMA-mapping subsystem that it's probably not worth the time to try
/// to allocate memory to in a way that gives better TLB efficiency.
pub const DMA_ATTR_ALLOC_SINGLE_PAGES: Attrs = Attrs(bindings::DMA_ATTR_ALLOC_SINGLE_PAGES);
- /// This tells the DMA-mapping subsystem to suppress allocation failure reports (similarly to
+ /// Tells the DMA-mapping subsystem to suppress allocation failure reports (similarly to
/// __GFP_NOWARN).
pub const DMA_ATTR_NO_WARN: Attrs = Attrs(bindings::DMA_ATTR_NO_WARN);
- /// Used to indicate that the buffer is fully accessible at an elevated privilege level (and
+ /// Indicates that the buffer is fully accessible at an elevated privilege level (and
/// ideally inaccessible or at least read-only at lesser-privileged levels).
pub const DMA_ATTR_PRIVILEGED: Attrs = Attrs(bindings::DMA_ATTR_PRIVILEGED);
}
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ pub mod attrs {
/// An abstraction of the `dma_alloc_coherent` API.
///
/// This is an abstraction around the `dma_alloc_coherent` API which is used to allocate and map
-/// large consistent DMA regions.
+/// large coherent DMA regions.
///
/// A [`CoherentAllocation`] instance contains a pointer to the allocated region (in the
/// processor's virtual address space) and the device address which can be given to the device
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ pub mod attrs {
/// # Invariants
///
/// For the lifetime of an instance of [`CoherentAllocation`], the `cpu_addr` is a valid pointer
-/// to an allocated region of consistent memory and `dma_handle` is the DMA address base of
+/// to an allocated region of coherent memory and `dma_handle` is the DMA address base of
/// the region.
// TODO
//
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ pub struct CoherentAllocation<T: AsBytes + FromBytes> {
}
impl<T: AsBytes + FromBytes> CoherentAllocation<T> {
- /// Allocates a region of `size_of::<T> * count` of consistent memory.
+ /// Allocates a region of `size_of::<T> * count` of coherent memory.
///
/// # Examples
///
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 2/3] rust: dma: convert the read/write macros to return Result
2025-04-25 7:35 [PATCH v3 0/3] Additional improvements for dma coherent allocator Abdiel Janulgue
2025-04-25 7:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] rust: dma: clarify wording and be consistent in `coherent` nomenclature Abdiel Janulgue
@ 2025-04-25 7:35 ` Abdiel Janulgue
2025-04-25 7:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] rust: dma: add as_slice/write functions for CoherentAllocation Abdiel Janulgue
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Abdiel Janulgue @ 2025-04-25 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dakr, rust-for-linux
Cc: Miguel Ojeda, Alex Gaynor, Boqun Feng, Gary Guo,
Björn Roy Baron, Benno Lossin, Andreas Hindborg, Alice Ryhl,
Trevor Gross, Valentin Obst, open list, Marek Szyprowski,
Robin Murphy, airlied, open list:DMA MAPPING HELPERS,
Abdiel Janulgue
We could do better here by having the macros return `Result`,
so that we don't have to wrap these calls in a closure for
validation which is confusing.
Co-developed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/87h63qhz4q.fsf@kernel.org/
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@gmail.com>
---
rust/kernel/dma.rs | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
samples/rust/rust_dma.rs | 28 +++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rust/kernel/dma.rs b/rust/kernel/dma.rs
index d3f448868457..a61da5eeb017 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/dma.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/dma.rs
@@ -328,20 +328,22 @@ unsafe impl<T: AsBytes + FromBytes + Send> Send for CoherentAllocation<T> {}
#[macro_export]
macro_rules! dma_read {
($dma:expr, $idx: expr, $($field:tt)*) => {{
- let item = $crate::dma::CoherentAllocation::item_from_index(&$dma, $idx)?;
- // SAFETY: `item_from_index` ensures that `item` is always a valid pointer and can be
- // dereferenced. The compiler also further validates the expression on whether `field`
- // is a member of `item` when expanded by the macro.
- unsafe {
- let ptr_field = ::core::ptr::addr_of!((*item) $($field)*);
- $crate::dma::CoherentAllocation::field_read(&$dma, ptr_field)
- }
+ (|| -> ::core::result::Result<_, $crate::error::Error> {
+ let item = $crate::dma::CoherentAllocation::item_from_index(&$dma, $idx)?;
+ // SAFETY: `item_from_index` ensures that `item` is always a valid pointer and can be
+ // dereferenced. The compiler also further validates the expression on whether `field`
+ // is a member of `item` when expanded by the macro.
+ unsafe {
+ let ptr_field = ::core::ptr::addr_of!((*item) $($field)*);
+ ::core::result::Result::Ok($crate::dma::CoherentAllocation::field_read(&$dma, ptr_field))
+ }
+ })()
}};
($dma:ident [ $idx:expr ] $($field:tt)* ) => {
- $crate::dma_read!($dma, $idx, $($field)*);
+ $crate::dma_read!($dma, $idx, $($field)*)
};
($($dma:ident).* [ $idx:expr ] $($field:tt)* ) => {
- $crate::dma_read!($($dma).*, $idx, $($field)*);
+ $crate::dma_read!($($dma).*, $idx, $($field)*)
};
}
@@ -368,24 +370,30 @@ macro_rules! dma_read {
#[macro_export]
macro_rules! dma_write {
($dma:ident [ $idx:expr ] $($field:tt)*) => {{
- $crate::dma_write!($dma, $idx, $($field)*);
+ $crate::dma_write!($dma, $idx, $($field)*)
}};
($($dma:ident).* [ $idx:expr ] $($field:tt)* ) => {{
- $crate::dma_write!($($dma).*, $idx, $($field)*);
+ $crate::dma_write!($($dma).*, $idx, $($field)*)
}};
($dma:expr, $idx: expr, = $val:expr) => {
- let item = $crate::dma::CoherentAllocation::item_from_index(&$dma, $idx)?;
- // SAFETY: `item_from_index` ensures that `item` is always a valid item.
- unsafe { $crate::dma::CoherentAllocation::field_write(&$dma, item, $val) }
+ (|| -> ::core::result::Result<_, $crate::error::Error> {
+ let item = $crate::dma::CoherentAllocation::item_from_index(&$dma, $idx)?;
+ // SAFETY: `item_from_index` ensures that `item` is always a valid item.
+ unsafe { $crate::dma::CoherentAllocation::field_write(&$dma, item, $val) }
+ ::core::result::Result::Ok(())
+ })()
};
($dma:expr, $idx: expr, $(.$field:ident)* = $val:expr) => {
- let item = $crate::dma::CoherentAllocation::item_from_index(&$dma, $idx)?;
- // SAFETY: `item_from_index` ensures that `item` is always a valid pointer and can be
- // dereferenced. The compiler also further validates the expression on whether `field`
- // is a member of `item` when expanded by the macro.
- unsafe {
- let ptr_field = ::core::ptr::addr_of_mut!((*item) $(.$field)*);
- $crate::dma::CoherentAllocation::field_write(&$dma, ptr_field, $val)
- }
+ (|| -> ::core::result::Result<_, $crate::error::Error> {
+ let item = $crate::dma::CoherentAllocation::item_from_index(&$dma, $idx)?;
+ // SAFETY: `item_from_index` ensures that `item` is always a valid pointer and can be
+ // dereferenced. The compiler also further validates the expression on whether `field`
+ // is a member of `item` when expanded by the macro.
+ unsafe {
+ let ptr_field = ::core::ptr::addr_of_mut!((*item) $(.$field)*);
+ $crate::dma::CoherentAllocation::field_write(&$dma, ptr_field, $val)
+ }
+ ::core::result::Result::Ok(())
+ })()
};
}
diff --git a/samples/rust/rust_dma.rs b/samples/rust/rust_dma.rs
index 874c2c964afa..9e05d5c0cdae 100644
--- a/samples/rust/rust_dma.rs
+++ b/samples/rust/rust_dma.rs
@@ -54,13 +54,9 @@ fn probe(pdev: &pci::Device<Core>, _info: &Self::IdInfo) -> Result<Pin<KBox<Self
let ca: CoherentAllocation<MyStruct> =
CoherentAllocation::alloc_coherent(pdev.as_ref(), TEST_VALUES.len(), GFP_KERNEL)?;
- || -> Result {
- for (i, value) in TEST_VALUES.into_iter().enumerate() {
- kernel::dma_write!(ca[i] = MyStruct::new(value.0, value.1));
- }
-
- Ok(())
- }()?;
+ for (i, value) in TEST_VALUES.into_iter().enumerate() {
+ kernel::dma_write!(ca[i] = MyStruct::new(value.0, value.1))?;
+ }
let drvdata = KBox::new(
Self {
@@ -78,13 +74,19 @@ impl Drop for DmaSampleDriver {
fn drop(&mut self) {
dev_info!(self.pdev.as_ref(), "Unload DMA test driver.\n");
- let _ = || -> Result {
- for (i, value) in TEST_VALUES.into_iter().enumerate() {
- assert_eq!(kernel::dma_read!(self.ca[i].h), value.0);
- assert_eq!(kernel::dma_read!(self.ca[i].b), value.1);
+ for (i, value) in TEST_VALUES.into_iter().enumerate() {
+ let val0 = kernel::dma_read!(self.ca[i].h);
+ let val1 = kernel::dma_read!(self.ca[i].b);
+ assert!(val0.is_ok());
+ assert!(val1.is_ok());
+
+ if let Ok(val0) = val0 {
+ assert_eq!(val0, value.0);
+ }
+ if let Ok(val1) = val1 {
+ assert_eq!(val1, value.1);
}
- Ok(())
- }();
+ }
}
}
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 3/3] rust: dma: add as_slice/write functions for CoherentAllocation
2025-04-25 7:35 [PATCH v3 0/3] Additional improvements for dma coherent allocator Abdiel Janulgue
2025-04-25 7:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] rust: dma: clarify wording and be consistent in `coherent` nomenclature Abdiel Janulgue
2025-04-25 7:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] rust: dma: convert the read/write macros to return Result Abdiel Janulgue
@ 2025-04-25 7:35 ` Abdiel Janulgue
2025-04-25 13:42 ` Alexandre Courbot
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Abdiel Janulgue @ 2025-04-25 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dakr, rust-for-linux
Cc: Miguel Ojeda, Alex Gaynor, Boqun Feng, Gary Guo,
Björn Roy Baron, Benno Lossin, Andreas Hindborg, Alice Ryhl,
Trevor Gross, Valentin Obst, open list, Marek Szyprowski,
Robin Murphy, airlied, open list:DMA MAPPING HELPERS,
Abdiel Janulgue
Add unsafe accessors for the region for reading or writing large
blocks of data.
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@gmail.com>
---
rust/kernel/dma.rs | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 85 insertions(+)
diff --git a/rust/kernel/dma.rs b/rust/kernel/dma.rs
index a61da5eeb017..e01bb7e7c440 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/dma.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/dma.rs
@@ -218,6 +218,91 @@ pub fn dma_handle(&self) -> bindings::dma_addr_t {
self.dma_handle
}
+ /// Returns the data from the region starting from `offset` as a slice.
+ /// `offset` and `count` are in units of `T`, not the number of bytes.
+ ///
+ /// For ringbuffer type of r/w access or use-cases where the pointer to the live data is needed,
+ /// [`CoherentAllocation::start_ptr`] or [`CoherentAllocation::start_ptr_mut`] could be used instead.
+ ///
+ /// # Safety
+ ///
+ /// * Callers must ensure that the device does not read/write to/from memory while the returned
+ /// slice is live.
+ /// * Callers must ensure that this call does not race with a write to the same region while
+ /// while the returned slice is live.
+ pub unsafe fn as_slice(&self, offset: usize, count: usize) -> Result<&[T]> {
+ let end = offset.checked_add(count).ok_or(EOVERFLOW)?;
+ if end > self.count {
+ return Err(EINVAL);
+ }
+ // SAFETY:
+ // - The pointer is valid due to type invariant on `CoherentAllocation`,
+ // we've just checked that the range and index is within bounds. The immutability of the
+ // of data is also guaranteed by the safety requirements of the function.
+ // - `offset` can't overflow since it is smaller than `self.count` and we've checked
+ // that `self.count` won't overflow early in the constructor.
+ Ok(unsafe { core::slice::from_raw_parts(self.cpu_addr.add(offset), count) })
+ }
+
+ /// Performs the same functionality as [`CoherentAllocation::as_slice`], except that a mutable
+ /// slice is returned.
+ ///
+ /// # Safety
+ ///
+ /// * Callers must ensure that the device does not read/write to/from memory while the returned
+ /// slice is live.
+ /// * Callers must ensure that this call does not race with a read or write to the same region
+ /// while the returned slice is live.
+ pub unsafe fn as_slice_mut(&self, offset: usize, count: usize) -> Result<&mut [T]> {
+ let end = offset.checked_add(count).ok_or(EOVERFLOW)?;
+ if end > self.count {
+ return Err(EINVAL);
+ }
+ // SAFETY:
+ // - The pointer is valid due to type invariant on `CoherentAllocation`,
+ // we've just checked that the range and index is within bounds. The immutability of the
+ // of data is also guaranteed by the safety requirements of the function.
+ // - `offset` can't overflow since it is smaller than `self.count` and we've checked
+ // that `self.count` won't overflow early in the constructor.
+ Ok(unsafe { core::slice::from_raw_parts_mut(self.cpu_addr.add(offset), count) })
+ }
+
+ /// Writes data to the region starting from `offset`. `offset` is in units of `T`, not the
+ /// number of bytes.
+ ///
+ /// # Safety
+ ///
+ /// * Callers must ensure that the device does not read/write to/from memory while the returned
+ /// slice is live.
+ /// * Callers must ensure that this call does not race with a read or write to the same region
+ /// that overlaps with this write.
+ ///
+ /// # Examples
+ ///
+ /// ```
+ /// # fn test(alloc: &mut kernel::dma::CoherentAllocation<u8>) -> Result {
+ /// let somedata: [u8; 4] = [0xf; 4];
+ /// let buf: &[u8] = &somedata;
+ /// // SAFETY: No hw operation on the device and no other r/w access to the region at this point.
+ /// unsafe { alloc.write(buf, 0)?; }
+ /// # Ok::<(), Error>(()) }
+ /// ```
+ pub unsafe fn write(&self, src: &[T], offset: usize) -> Result {
+ let end = offset.checked_add(src.len()).ok_or(EOVERFLOW)?;
+ if end > self.count {
+ return Err(EINVAL);
+ }
+ // SAFETY:
+ // - The pointer is valid due to type invariant on `CoherentAllocation`
+ // and we've just checked that the range and index is within bounds.
+ // - `offset` can't overflow since it is smaller than `self.count` and we've checked
+ // that `self.count` won't overflow early in the constructor.
+ unsafe {
+ core::ptr::copy_nonoverlapping(src.as_ptr(), self.cpu_addr.add(offset), src.len())
+ };
+ Ok(())
+ }
+
/// Returns a pointer to an element from the region with bounds checking. `offset` is in
/// units of `T`, not the number of bytes.
///
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] rust: dma: add as_slice/write functions for CoherentAllocation
2025-04-25 7:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] rust: dma: add as_slice/write functions for CoherentAllocation Abdiel Janulgue
@ 2025-04-25 13:42 ` Alexandre Courbot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Courbot @ 2025-04-25 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Abdiel Janulgue, dakr, rust-for-linux
Cc: Miguel Ojeda, Alex Gaynor, Boqun Feng, Gary Guo,
Björn Roy Baron, Benno Lossin, Andreas Hindborg, Alice Ryhl,
Trevor Gross, Valentin Obst, open list, Marek Szyprowski,
Robin Murphy, airlied, open list:DMA MAPPING HELPERS
Hi Abdiel,
On Fri Apr 25, 2025 at 4:35 PM JST, Abdiel Janulgue wrote:
> Add unsafe accessors for the region for reading or writing large
> blocks of data.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@gmail.com>
> ---
> rust/kernel/dma.rs | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/dma.rs b/rust/kernel/dma.rs
> index a61da5eeb017..e01bb7e7c440 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/dma.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/dma.rs
> @@ -218,6 +218,91 @@ pub fn dma_handle(&self) -> bindings::dma_addr_t {
> self.dma_handle
> }
>
> + /// Returns the data from the region starting from `offset` as a slice.
> + /// `offset` and `count` are in units of `T`, not the number of bytes.
> + ///
> + /// For ringbuffer type of r/w access or use-cases where the pointer to the live data is needed,
> + /// [`CoherentAllocation::start_ptr`] or [`CoherentAllocation::start_ptr_mut`] could be used instead.
> + ///
> + /// # Safety
> + ///
> + /// * Callers must ensure that the device does not read/write to/from memory while the returned
> + /// slice is live.
> + /// * Callers must ensure that this call does not race with a write to the same region while
> + /// while the returned slice is live.
"while" is repeated twice in the second bullet point.
> + pub unsafe fn as_slice(&self, offset: usize, count: usize) -> Result<&[T]> {
> + let end = offset.checked_add(count).ok_or(EOVERFLOW)?;
> + if end > self.count {
> + return Err(EINVAL);
> + }
Since `end` is not subsequently used, how about reworking this to avoid
declaring it as a variable that is visible for the whole method:
offset.checked_add(count)
.ok_or(EOVERFLOW)
.and_then(|end| if end > self.count { Err(EINVAL) } else { Ok(()) })?;
Or maybe better, move this into a private helper method:
fn validate_range(&self, offset: usize, count: usize) -> Result<()>
that you can call from all three methods requiring it instead of
duplicating the same code snippet (in that case, you can declare `end`
if you prefer this style as it will be useful for the entirety of the
method).
> + // SAFETY:
> + // - The pointer is valid due to type invariant on `CoherentAllocation`,
> + // we've just checked that the range and index is within bounds. The immutability of the
> + // of data is also guaranteed by the safety requirements of the function.
"of the of data" sounds like a typo.
> + // - `offset` can't overflow since it is smaller than `self.count` and we've checked
> + // that `self.count` won't overflow early in the constructor.
IIUC you rather need to state that `offset + count` (not just `offset`)
is smaller than `self.count`?
Same comments apply to `as_slice_mut` and `write`.
Cheers,
Alex.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-04-25 13:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-04-25 7:35 [PATCH v3 0/3] Additional improvements for dma coherent allocator Abdiel Janulgue
2025-04-25 7:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] rust: dma: clarify wording and be consistent in `coherent` nomenclature Abdiel Janulgue
2025-04-25 7:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] rust: dma: convert the read/write macros to return Result Abdiel Janulgue
2025-04-25 7:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] rust: dma: add as_slice/write functions for CoherentAllocation Abdiel Janulgue
2025-04-25 13:42 ` Alexandre Courbot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).