From: "Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>
To: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
Cc: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <rafael@kernel.org>,
<ojeda@kernel.org>, <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
<boqun.feng@gmail.com>, <gary@garyguo.net>,
<bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>, <benno.lossin@proton.me>,
<a.hindborg@kernel.org>, <aliceryhl@google.com>,
<tmgross@umich.edu>, <rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] rust: devres: implement register_foreign_release()
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 22:14:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DATC5A2JBHZQ.33AFQQP6V6L1A@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aFf7QVhqE6dhp0m2@pollux>
On Sun Jun 22, 2025 at 2:46 PM CEST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 09:26:33AM +0200, Benno Lossin wrote:
>> On Thu Jun 12, 2025 at 4:51 PM CEST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>> > +pub trait Release {
>> > + /// Called once the [`Device`] given to [`register_foreign_release`] is unbound.
>> > + fn release(&self);
>>
>> Would it make sense to also supply the `Device` that this is attached
>> to? In case you have one object in multiple `register_foreign_release`
>> calls with different devices, or is that something that doesn't happen?
>
> No, doing that wouldn't make any sense. A resource should only be bound to the
> lifetime of a single device.
But the API doesn't prevent it... Does it make more sense to instead ask
the user to provide a closure?
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +impl<T: Release> Release for crate::sync::ArcBorrow<'_, T> {
>> > + fn release(&self) {
>> > + self.deref().release();
>> > + }
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +impl<T: Release> Release for Pin<&'_ T> {
>> > + fn release(&self) {
>> > + self.deref().release();
>> > + }
>> > +}
>>
>> We should also implement it for `&T`, since that is `Box`'s `Borrowed`.
>
> That should implicitly be the case when T: Release, where T is P<T>.
I don't understand? When `P` is set to `Box<T>` in the
`register_foreign_release` below, then `P::Borrow<'_> == &'_ T` and the
bound of `&T: Release` is not satisfied.
>> > +
>> > +/// Consume the `data`, [`Release::release`] and [`Drop::drop`] `data` once `dev` is unbound.
>> > +///
>> > +/// # Examples
>> > +///
>> > +/// ```no_run
>> > +/// use kernel::{device::{Bound, Device}, devres, devres::Release, sync::Arc};
>> > +///
>> > +/// struct Registration<T> {
>>
>> Maybe add some explanation above/below this example. It looks like a new
>> bus registration?
>
> *class device registration, see Registration::new() below. But I can also add a
> brief comment to the struct. It's indeed a bit subtly this way. :)
I'd just add a small paragraph explaining what it does :)
---
Cheers,
Benno
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-22 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-12 14:51 [PATCH 0/4] Improvements for Devres Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-12 14:51 ` [PATCH 1/4] rust: revocable: support fallible PinInit types Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-12 15:48 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-12 15:58 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-12 16:17 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-12 16:20 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-12 14:51 ` [PATCH 2/4] rust: devres: replace Devres::new_foreign_owned() Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-13 3:14 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-06-21 21:10 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-21 21:45 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-22 7:42 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-22 9:55 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-22 20:18 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-12 14:51 ` [PATCH 3/4] rust: devres: get rid of Devres' inner Arc Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-22 7:05 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-22 12:08 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-22 20:16 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-22 15:45 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-22 20:15 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-12 14:51 ` [PATCH 4/4] rust: devres: implement register_foreign_release() Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-22 7:26 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-22 12:46 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-22 20:14 ` Benno Lossin [this message]
2025-06-22 20:25 ` Danilo Krummrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DATC5A2JBHZQ.33AFQQP6V6L1A@kernel.org \
--to=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=benno.lossin@proton.me \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).