Re: [PATCH v8 6/9] rust: sync: atomic: Add the framework of arithmetic operations

["Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>]

On Sun Aug 17, 2025 at 5:04 AM CEST, Boqun Feng wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2025 at 09:35:26PM +0200, Benno Lossin wrote:
>> On Sat Aug 16, 2025 at 6:10 PM CEST, Boqun Feng wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 10:04:12AM +0200, Benno Lossin wrote:
>> >> On Sat Jul 19, 2025 at 5:08 AM CEST, Boqun Feng wrote:
>> >> > +/// Types that support atomic add operations.
>> >> > +///
>> >> > +/// # Safety
>> >> > +///
>> >> > +/// `wrapping_add` any value of type `Self::Repr::Delta` obtained by [`Self::rhs_into_delta()`] to
>> >> 
>> >> Can you add a normal comment TODO here:
>> >> 
>> >>     // TODO: properly define `wrapping_add` in this context.
>> >
>> > Yeah, this sounds good to me. How do you propose we arrange the normal
>> > comment with the doc comment, somthing like:
>> >
>> >     // TODO: properly define `wrapping_add` in this context.
>> >     
>> >     /// Types that support atomic add operations.
>> >     ///
>> >     /// # Safety
>> >     ///
>> >     /// `wrapping_add` any value of type `Self::Repr::Delta` obtained by [`Self::rhs_into_delta()`] to
>> >     ...
>> >     pub unsafe trait AtomicAdd<...> {
>> >         ...
>> >     }
>> 
>> 
>> Inline maybe?
>> 
>>     /// Types that support atomic add operations.
>>     ///
>>     /// # Safety
>>     ///
>>     // TODO: properly define `wrapping_add` in this context:
>
> The colon looks a bit weird to me. I would replace that with a period,
> i.e.
>
>      // TODO: properly define `wrapping_add` in the following comment.
>      /// `wrapping_add` any value of type `Self::Repr::Delta` obtained by [`Self::rhs_into_delta()`] to
>
> Thoughts?

Also works for me :)

---
Cheers,
Benno