From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 325AD2C21F7; Mon, 20 Oct 2025 11:43:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760960601; cv=none; b=pWuSb+yAYP12TYHegv3I9MxQl30fsltpo2ZKhWQOqTuIgLUsOUu11E+V+PFzn/ulmWGjQjagTHDxw/E8XkoVbzfBtGYmOYYOg/B4CJlKev4L8Ay1+NSeEw8c9/hVZIwh6OeXUbkhwUxXyB3iMzmqPy405wGUKQJGF3vIxx3iQGA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760960601; c=relaxed/simple; bh=B69GDjU7rcIN6aWKrOCldO5I8FMquM4tO9WqlxbscYQ=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From: References:In-Reply-To; b=oZXFwujXi3C7L3QLV8PujTWTBn/70aqZjmW6niPrMXf5cUvw4m5/fP472MCTgEx0RZ2cHoHN8mywz2Dc4hRf6Ymb8SOTgtS4MGdmnadYNnJP8q+seYDI3qrm4eZdPQ1waFVRHC3y4/7ep+Htjzr125JQu+cc0ofIf5r/hZyJ2VE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=B5Mwn2+W; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="B5Mwn2+W" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD5F2C4CEF9; Mon, 20 Oct 2025 11:43:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1760960600; bh=B69GDjU7rcIN6aWKrOCldO5I8FMquM4tO9WqlxbscYQ=; h=Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=B5Mwn2+WokAdLapBqYFNpXn/UrcEksJVpETcyUsBHAWihpPmEeehcnqgxA2t1grFy UZ/HoFLloYhWah1yiky+C3cNhmKXu1aao5zapBFrrmkM122ZMT2U9pU4tak398lOtt 7V0lWafqj4yzvhdoXYfRAsOgd6SICIHEZAPjOkWiudhy4dVmmc7jXSRws8ZaEG2U7A 3HE+VB+cdJJ+KLvuz1/SsNi5gxPX6ROS9o4FJ7SyXf6lG8jmI3fqNKAu4YeC5dU2Ep YSyuMAwc7a99jVCCcn/EtltyE7AEoD5L3EQrjHFEJrIadgzd1j0nj59BGz3bPpTtPM ZVcGZ+d9ZtBbg== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 13:43:16 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] rust: pci: consistently use INTx and PCI BAR in comments Cc: "Miguel Ojeda" , "Alex Gaynor" , "Bjorn Helgaas" , =?utf-8?q?Krzysztof_Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , "Boqun Feng" , "Gary Guo" , =?utf-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Roy_Baron?= , "Benno Lossin" , "Andreas Hindborg" , "Alice Ryhl" , "Trevor Gross" , , , To: "Peter Colberg" From: "Danilo Krummrich" References: <20251019045620.2080-1-pcolberg@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20251019045620.2080-1-pcolberg@redhat.com> Hi Peter, On Sun Oct 19, 2025 at 6:56 AM CEST, Peter Colberg wrote: > This patch series normalises the comments of the Rust PCI abstractions > to consistently refer to legacy as INTx interrupts and use the spelling > PCI BAR, as a way to familiarise myself with the Rust for Linux project. That's great to hear! :) Can you please rebase the two patches on driver-core-testing [1]? [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/driver-core/driver-core= .git/log/?h=3Ddriver-core-testing