From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86E0734D3BE; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 21:17:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761859033; cv=none; b=F5jnYWWrzvIE6KOK1HiGm01JV81qnIP9SqAl2egc0ISQJETijoLe4Gil8j043unIbJBN9zzEtIOGDFiOnXyheuDZVPvkamaMjgc95lwh9zCXcCDUyXkui0PfASlEjMaABIMlTvOfzhkWbtH+rVqZVdBiua3S56STQ5aDGoNPtSI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761859033; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XermN9jQ3wZ4fqlqqOotYOXuBNHynIWoOTfpAp4RGHs=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From: References:In-Reply-To; b=btakyxWdBYOprG82JL6CjAl94Dke1cRVfHXRrOQhk4xQP9N8PT1s9uFgFPyDlIwWMfbIUOZaJoHK80aNsv7FubEdsET+04yODQP5EjlIgsRwUZQ7l/o+VFaMf9Z7SJ4wnue4WG1AhpCXSznUJINefsc+KHFUCrolvHyiqTenyo4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=i6CKBQtA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="i6CKBQtA" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E9C3C4CEF1; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 21:17:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1761859033; bh=XermN9jQ3wZ4fqlqqOotYOXuBNHynIWoOTfpAp4RGHs=; h=Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=i6CKBQtAZlBdtQH0O7unusyS7sO0aEpyqbQLRfXvYDlYSBC1ShdDPzNSNS9wijlik mEx4tLoxpKcnpALBY9+5WuJEjuiEUNVi76+KrThmXpWcNE683gNJH3hSB2Ug3qjWXN QLXnpalf9B7HkXoZe5Fp6KxEMuKgiKYWeM+6nEYseue1SNT8p9X8hsDAcdCQnt9Wnb Q6lmf+LdtEtSk6OQTUPvLGIpTEG9aiquw3B08cvPdvHIXUy/+UcUvTmTtG2t+301am kj98w6ag8lOE4msRzrcYL8gXR5PMVsbQrRVr1s6ACdZRPLnkq96n3e82FY6zxW3sgW yLGBc9cR/tMiA== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 22:17:06 +0100 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4/4] samples: rust: Add sample demonstrating DRM buddy allocator Cc: , , , "David Airlie" , , "Alistair Popple" , "Miguel Ojeda" , "Alex Gaynor" , "Boqun Feng" , "Gary Guo" , , "Benno Lossin" , "Andreas Hindborg" , "Alice Ryhl" , "Trevor Gross" , "Simona Vetter" , "Maarten Lankhorst" , "Maxime Ripard" , "Thomas Zimmermann" , "John Hubbard" , "Timur Tabi" , , "Elle Rhumsaa" , "Daniel Almeida" , "Andrea Righi" , "Philipp Stanner" , To: "Joel Fernandes" From: "Danilo Krummrich" References: <20251030190613.1224287-1-joelagnelf@nvidia.com> <20251030190613.1224287-5-joelagnelf@nvidia.com> In-Reply-To: <20251030190613.1224287-5-joelagnelf@nvidia.com> On Thu Oct 30, 2025 at 8:06 PM CET, Joel Fernandes wrote: > Demonstrates usage of the DRM buddy allocator bindings through > a simple test module that initializes the allocator, performs > allocations, and prints information about the allocated blocks. I don't think this should be a sample module either, the code looks a bit l= ike it tries to reinvents kunit tests.