From: "Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>
To: "Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Cc: <bshephar@bne-home.net>, <dakr@kernel.org>,
<joelagnelf@nvidia.com>, <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
<airlied@gmail.com>, <rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>,
<nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>, <brendan.shephard@gmail.com>,
"Nouveau" <nouveau-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm: nova: Align GEM memory allocation to system page size
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 09:31:46 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DEI7BMSG3JTC.1Q0OZIUHCK4ZM@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH5fLgjUzryZubjfUPfNc_beE80iiptebAcTyFi25OzZkTKR8g@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue Nov 25, 2025 at 11:59 PM JST, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 3:55 PM Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue Nov 25, 2025 at 11:41 PM JST, Alice Ryhl wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 3:29 PM Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Fri Nov 21, 2025 at 1:04 PM JST, bshephar wrote:
>> >> > Use page::page_align for GEM object memory allocation to ensure the
>> >> > allocation is page aligned. This ensures that the allocation is page
>> >> > aligned with the system in cases where 4096 is not the default.
>> >> > For example on 16k or 64k aarch64 systems this allocation should be
>> >> > aligned accordingly.
>> >> >
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Brendan Shephard <bshephar@bne-home.net>
>> >> > ---
>> >> > drivers/gpu/drm/nova/gem.rs | 11 ++++++++---
>> >> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >> >
>> >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nova/gem.rs b/drivers/gpu/drm/nova/gem.rs
>> >> > index 2760ba4f3450..a07e922e25ef 100644
>> >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nova/gem.rs
>> >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nova/gem.rs
>> >> > @@ -3,6 +3,10 @@
>> >> > use kernel::{
>> >> > drm,
>> >> > drm::{gem, gem::BaseObject},
>> >> > + page::{
>> >> > + page_align,
>> >> > + PAGE_SIZE, //
>> >> > + },
>> >> > prelude::*,
>> >> > sync::aref::ARef,
>> >> > };
>> >> > @@ -27,12 +31,13 @@ fn new(_dev: &NovaDevice, _size: usize) -> impl PinInit<Self, Error> {
>> >> > impl NovaObject {
>> >> > /// Create a new DRM GEM object.
>> >> > pub(crate) fn new(dev: &NovaDevice, size: usize) -> Result<ARef<gem::Object<Self>>> {
>> >> > - let aligned_size = size.next_multiple_of(1 << 12);
>> >> > -
>> >> > - if size == 0 || size > aligned_size {
>> >> > + // Check for 0 size or potential usize overflow before calling page_align
>> >> > + if size == 0 || size > usize::MAX - PAGE_SIZE + 1 {
>> >>
>> >> `PAGE_SIZE` here is no more correct than the hardcoded `1 << 12` - well,
>> >> I'll admit it looks better as a placeholder. :) But the actual alignment
>> >> will eventually be provided elsewhere.
>> >
>> > What about kernels with 16k pages?
>>
>> The actual alignment should IIUC be a mix of the GPU and kernel's
>> requirements (GPU can also use a different page size). So no matter what
>> we pick right now, it won't be great but you are right that PAGE_SIZE
>> will at least accomodate the kernel.
>
> In that case, is PAGE_SIZE not the wrong constant? What's the actually
> correct constant here?
>
>> >> > return Err(EINVAL);
>> >> > }
>> >> >
>> >> > + let aligned_size = page_align(size);
>> >>
>> >> `page_align` won't panic on overflow, but it will still return an
>> >> invalid size. This is a job for `kernel::ptr::Alignment`, which let's
>> >> you return an error when an overflow occurs.
>> >
>> > The Rust implementation of page_align() is implemented as (addr +
>> > (PAGE_SIZE - 1)) & PAGE_MASK, which definitely will panic on overflow
>> > if the appropriate config options are enabled.
>>
>> That's right, I skimmed its code too fast. ^_^; All the more reason to
>> use `Alignment`.
>
> Alignment stores values that are powers of two, not multiples of PAGE_SIZE.
Isn't PAGE_SIZE always a power of two though?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-26 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-21 4:04 [PATCH 1/1] drm: nova: Align GEM memory allocation to system page size bshephar
2025-11-25 7:41 ` bshephar
2025-11-25 9:23 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-11-26 5:49 ` Brendan Shephard
2025-11-26 9:53 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-11-25 14:28 ` Alexandre Courbot
2025-11-25 14:41 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-11-25 14:55 ` Alexandre Courbot
2025-11-25 14:59 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-11-26 0:31 ` Alexandre Courbot [this message]
2025-11-26 9:54 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-11-26 13:22 ` Alexandre Courbot
2025-11-26 13:36 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-11-26 14:00 ` Alexandre Courbot
2025-11-26 16:24 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-11-26 21:14 ` Brendan Shephard
2025-11-26 6:05 ` Brendan Shephard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DEI7BMSG3JTC.1Q0OZIUHCK4ZM@nvidia.com \
--to=acourbot@nvidia.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=brendan.shephard@gmail.com \
--cc=bshephar@bne-home.net \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=nouveau-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).