Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] rust: gpuvm: add GpuVm::obtain()

["Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>]

On Mon Jan 26, 2026 at 4:35 PM CET, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 16:07:30 +0100
> Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 4:00 PM Boris Brezillon
>> <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed, 21 Jan 2026 11:31:19 +0000
>> > Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> wrote:
>> >  
>> > > +/// A [`GpuVmBo`] object in the GEM list.
>> > > +///
>> > > +/// # Invariants
>> > > +///
>> > > +/// Points at a `drm_gpuvm_bo` that contains a valid `T::VmBoData` and is present in the gem list.
>> > > +pub struct GpuVmBoResident<T: DriverGpuVm>(NonNull<GpuVmBo<T>>);  
>> >
>> > I find the name a bit confusing: BO residency is often used to refer to
>> > memory backing the buffer object, and in this case, you can end up with
>> > a GpuVmBoResident being returned for a BO that has been evicted (one
>> > that's no longer resident).  
>> 
>> Good point. I meant it as "present in list" but I guess there are
>> other things a gpuvm may be present in.
>> 
>> Any naming suggestions?
>
> Valid, Bound, Present, Active?

I still have to catch up on this series, but quick drive-by comment: I'd go for
'Registered'.