From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
To: "Shivam Kalra" <shivamklr@cock.li>
Cc: <cmllamas@google.com>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
<aliceryhl@google.com>, <rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
<vbabka@suse.cz>, <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>, <urezki@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] rust: alloc: Add shrink_to and shrink_to_fit methods to Vec
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2026 16:19:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DG5FEPO6RCK4.17KOY7PRLNFKV@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260131154016.270385-2-shivamklr@cock.li>
On Sat Jan 31, 2026 at 4:40 PM CET, Shivam Kalra wrote:
> This implementation guarantees shrinking (unless already optimal),
> because the kernel allocators don't support in-place shrinking,
> a new allocation is always made.
I'm not sure we should go in this direction. There is a reason why krealloc()
does not migrate memory between kmalloc buckets, i.e. the cost of migration vs.
memory saving.
For Vmalloc buffers the story is a bit different though. When I wrote vrealloc()
I left some TODO comments [1][2].
(1) If a smaller buffer is requested we can shrink the vm_area, i.e. unmap and
free unused pages.
(2) If a bigger buffer is requested we can grow the vm_area, i.e. allocate and
map additional pages. (At least as long as we have enough space in the
virtual address space.)
So, I think we should just use A::realloc(), leave the rest to the underlying
specific realloc() implementations and address the TODOs in vrealloc() if
necessary.
[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.18.6/source/mm/vmalloc.c#L4162
[2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.18.6/source/mm/vmalloc.c#L4192
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-03 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-31 15:40 [PATCH v2 0/3] rust: alloc: add Vec shrinking methods Shivam Kalra
2026-01-31 15:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] rust: alloc: Add shrink_to and shrink_to_fit methods to Vec Shivam Kalra
2026-02-03 15:19 ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2026-02-03 15:38 ` Alice Ryhl
2026-02-03 15:43 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-02-03 17:48 ` Shivam Kalra
2026-02-04 10:32 ` Alice Ryhl
2026-02-04 11:50 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-02-04 21:55 ` Shivam Kalra
2026-01-31 15:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] rust: alloc: add KUnit tests for Vec shrinking Shivam Kalra
2026-02-01 0:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] binder: context: shrink all_procs vector to reclaim memory Shivam Kalra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DG5FEPO6RCK4.17KOY7PRLNFKV@kernel.org \
--to=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=cmllamas@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shivamklr@cock.li \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox