Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] rust: alloc: add Vec shrinking methods

["Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>]

On Tue Feb 10, 2026 at 9:53 PM CET, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Tue Feb 10, 2026 at 9:43 PM CET, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>> On Tue Feb 10, 2026 at 9:05 PM CET, Alice Ryhl wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 4:05 PM Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue Feb 10, 2026 at 2:57 PM CET, Alice Ryhl wrote:
>>>> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 07:08:09PM +0530, Shivam Kalra wrote:
>>>> >> This is a follow-up to my v3 series:
>>>> >> https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20260207-binder-shrink-vec-v3-v3-0-8ff388563427@cock.li/
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Hi all,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Thanks for the feedback on v3. Before I respin, I want to confirm
>>>> >> the direction for v4 to avoid unnecessary iterations.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Proposed changes for v4:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> 1. Drop the Shrinkable trait entirely. Make shrink_to() a normal
>>>> >>    method on Vec<T, A> that calls A::realloc(). (Danilo)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> 2. Add a temporary ShrinkQuirk trait to handle the vmalloc workaround
>>>> >>    (page-boundary check + manual alloc+copy+free) until vrealloc
>>>> >>    gains in-place shrinking support. (Danilo)
>>>> >
>>>> > I don't think you want any new traits at all. What types would even
>>>> > implement the trait? The special code can go in the realloc() method of
>>>> > Vmalloc struct in rust/kernel/alloc/allocator.rs.
>>>>
>>>> I did not propose to move this into the realloc() functions of the corresponding
>>>> allocators intentionally, as there is a difference between calling realloc() and
>>>> shrink_to().
>>>>
>>>> I don't want that some user of e.g. Vmalloc::realloc() experiences page wise
>>>> shrinking by copy. This is acceptable for Vec::shrink_to(), but not for
>>>> realloc() in general.
>>>
>>> Ok. In that case we can add a method on KVVec directly for this
>>> purpose, but I still don't think we need a trait?
>>
>> KVVec::realloc() should not have this behavior either, we only want it for
>
> s/KVVec::realloc()/KVec::shrink_to()/
>
>> VVec::shrink_to() and KVVec::shrink_to(), so I think we need a temporary quirk
>> trait.
>
> Unless you mean to implement shrink_to() for VVec and KVVec only, that would be

s/and/or/ (Sorry for another correction, slightly distracted currently. :)

> fine with me as well.