From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E8591E0B86 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2026 18:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771439135; cv=none; b=CCO+EsDJmrAp6NmDwBle+CYPfDq9j7WVdG+F6p1zZUKVKwfZRl3ZNY0OL0E9Zfa/6tsRzPaWpj+suVRe6JqsM7FM5rp9E8XQRcWw2U49e3pOrJy0P58uFJrq3E1U24X9qFL8AJoFqjYIXuHBdcYjGFuT7UvtS9nSlwUkIlAI/NE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771439135; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dpEoJVkZ8u5zwCtoRACzTRgw6UcMbUu6PuWAlx+c9yk=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From: References:In-Reply-To; b=d0ANAQ2aAzen6ZV681XJL6RmfbdsBB2kmG/awNny0K6jrDgpa1uLBIrNfdnd90xEGcNE2b9p16kXLJkSXYudedA//WuIimzpvFe95FmLVXREGo2lLool9pWYm7dYjn87ZzRySrmyBFMtt1U9qO9DUDoWC7qs6GQTQKKL8eWZvG0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=UA66Sg3v; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UA66Sg3v" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EED4BC116D0; Wed, 18 Feb 2026 18:25:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1771439135; bh=dpEoJVkZ8u5zwCtoRACzTRgw6UcMbUu6PuWAlx+c9yk=; h=Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=UA66Sg3vn11PzJIZ/IgMHi+T1tlWVOLeAT15MPM+jsaBvCPmVw8BC5TNbqYOQrT1Q XoFc1jfb4eZ1cT9k8NBR3XEUN8gWrRWDgNzxz3LiBa7XZt7xThtXrJXUfn+66D0f3y 7HxWGEBRrYS824CbLpacKHJuuo6/yEp9sfPRjl0SKioD7nEqItdcP+frTPffE4Trn9 r/wz0wLh2rlGgOYoX1Y+3C+AFHOd0m+wlwmbybevhB+juvKAZlfHvO745df3Hdo1Fp dM7hHDvAH1PGOS3t1I3MAD/1j1UElHXZXfjTZeDCBgvAVUaOr26+gCCUDPCyZ5GO3X 1I2VdhgBb3Txw== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 19:25:31 +0100 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] rust: add pointer projection infrastructure and convert DMA Cc: "Gary Guo" , "Miguel Ojeda" , "Boqun Feng" , =?utf-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Roy_Baron?= , "Benno Lossin" , "Andreas Hindborg" , "Alice Ryhl" , "Trevor Gross" , "Alexandre Courbot" , To: "Miguel Ojeda" From: "Danilo Krummrich" References: <20260214053344.1994776-1-gary@garyguo.net> In-Reply-To: On Wed Feb 18, 2026 at 11:49 AM CET, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > I didn't know what your plan was I don't generally have a fixed plan for individual patches. Instead, I constantly evaluate the situation, considering dependencies, synergies, the release cycle, general feedback and stakeholder input -- and make a judgeme= nt call as the context evolves. For instance, in this case, there is a potential synergy with another fix, = which I did not mention so far as it does not define the timeline for this series= as it can also be addressed otherwise.