From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 391F0386450; Tue, 3 Mar 2026 19:55:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772567715; cv=none; b=Q0zTBflzDM/m6vfWnGpSC+PmJYqXF9ZiCPAVmz8keKvka5Om2tA3oyPeA/2dImvohDqsPY2HXjdar9iJR2dgmw6QDiAF+z4F52KzO9f1Wwm60EQyrkm05QZbN2+lRZYQqxF3kqj5LA/TNxY8VZHo6FKcDxypdkvbqH6LuWGyvLY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772567715; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WLB0VY039DbbQ0p18wQJ+NAynUKYf7KfWja7EdoN6Iw=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From: References:In-Reply-To; b=nFsx9qoUSTl6EHUDL1XIuO6kWHXCG9cUDbTIxsBPzgJ14lFWgFQg/vJgPPNRX93PyfycjbsUW+vYPZlm3SYLmTqK7gNrXFqSdjv/15OMvgssSswxhx7/2C4m40YgfD6B0jIkoPtPzLVY1ZAnNzGIWf2dHB74iz9oAaNc1k+OHd4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=YNE+gwD2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="YNE+gwD2" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1B63C116C6; Tue, 3 Mar 2026 19:55:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772567714; bh=WLB0VY039DbbQ0p18wQJ+NAynUKYf7KfWja7EdoN6Iw=; h=Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=YNE+gwD2ap3eRUTNWk/tlck5MikSbnXGPSlYydvyU4Wg5yRIotCx6wh3nyAd+f0qX pjg7BfVr1xNhckE1/uE+qAupUYqKZXre7yIlJtSRL07czwSmi6Cy4xhAz9U7PD/CvK vEROnoEO1If6L5VJLmpCgUcxQrskPl5JGergtMn/Tkir78EUQ2ck9WiLeh7oV2mnBu IHc0eEvJjgMtBFOs6SU3CIhkEbiiekgcRtolfYyM2PydCsWYu/PEIheWZ5eGEcBCO8 m9voW9h8VAaoW+4QB3wLi+en2LNgJGmbPE3FooNQNraDJohpEmtAMqH3UcGP4aDClZ z2/4rwKh1ICdg== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2026 20:55:10 +0100 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: irq: move 'static bounds to traits Cc: "Daniel Almeida" , "Miguel Ojeda" , "Boqun Feng" , "Gary Guo" , =?utf-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Roy_Baron?= , "Benno Lossin" , "Andreas Hindborg" , "Trevor Gross" , , To: "Alice Ryhl" From: "Danilo Krummrich" References: <20260219-irq-static-on-trait-v1-1-6ede6b743ea3@google.com> In-Reply-To: <20260219-irq-static-on-trait-v1-1-6ede6b743ea3@google.com> On Thu Feb 19, 2026 at 10:12 AM CET, Alice Ryhl wrote: > The 'static bound is required by all irq handlers, so it is simpler to > specify it on the trait declaration instead of repeating it every time > the trait is used as a where clause. Note that we already list Sync on > the trait bound for the same reason. > > Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl Applied to driver-core-testing, thanks!