From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC7173C8728; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 11:06:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774436817; cv=none; b=RmiJBi1QEDoAvQqt0wgBhkeLKqySUvrgGYfWTCSryDbTtPopCy7fNQzvAg4HFALQpLvfm22n5PYtswgautd4R3zyNRPOOKZXSSLiIKx6d3R8EmdbmUtGHL1dZsNEA1wNLgvcySyzJOHoTRvfa7aGcNsY9EEt7ejoqxf055Kr09g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774436817; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6eAoP8umGafawtXPql+xN1b7YnBGcg+Q8lsnnMIEWso=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From: References:In-Reply-To; b=gyzjR7tVmC3yayI/P/Jq6st/8cIjkayLSy+JYH/7KkAZ0uc9G9j7qWIheHXoIkzhKZ+bcpigV3BrDPAdmYNM6ZbnoG9sFC349eJH8w6UAWSAH7MFnAOaqk51OlV9bBZ7+OFHN5M730kdwXO1pPwONsTsIE7hu3b/ogkPW9IoFIM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=nRyUaIWq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="nRyUaIWq" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDEB9C4CEF7; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 11:06:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1774436816; bh=6eAoP8umGafawtXPql+xN1b7YnBGcg+Q8lsnnMIEWso=; h=Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=nRyUaIWqK+EK936RHQ4rF884ek+7MlmCvJIKDWJTP8marlz7YDyd2y/FsRODE4sR1 SNzNjEmkKU7Yq76vpXD9yTrLSg74KEVXsbj6mYZxC36dSOhL/pLhC1kPd2OUkjhMnA io59v6rL4SgT7H75p9UjZksHWrshwsBanbmpy5QRxuWwjWBq8c9gs5XKlFGEt7qUXa ODluilLF1wWr3BuoXP2FkcVgYomuu6cCYVThICeWQv1CgliA+zo6ZWJWjFSkYbyXsZ bTDCTdsswUJY6qwyZSXqf/Zfo/vuqtRUYrXBJ9IaMOpnT96qSXkpj+vcceBduc1sF7 xUHO8g+s3kosw== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 12:06:50 +0100 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rust: kasan: do not pass -Zsanitizer-recover Cc: "Andrey Ryabinin" , "Alexander Potapenko" , "Andrey Konovalov" , "Dmitry Vyukov" , "Vincenzo Frascino" , "Nathan Chancellor" , "Nick Desaulniers" , "Bill Wendling" , "Justin Stitt" , "Miguel Ojeda" , "Boqun Feng" , "Gary Guo" , =?utf-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Roy_Baron?= , "Benno Lossin" , "Andreas Hindborg" , "Trevor Gross" , , , , To: "Alice Ryhl" From: "Danilo Krummrich" References: <20260325-kasan-rust-sw-tags-v1-0-7d3a765a72aa@google.com> <20260325-kasan-rust-sw-tags-v1-1-7d3a765a72aa@google.com> In-Reply-To: <20260325-kasan-rust-sw-tags-v1-1-7d3a765a72aa@google.com> On Wed Mar 25, 2026 at 10:26 AM CET, Alice Ryhl wrote: > We do not pass -fsanitize-recover to clang, so for consistency we should > not pass -Zsanitizer-recover to rustc. Thus, remove these flags. Isn't this because clang forces it regardless? Is this true for rustc as we= ll?