public inbox for rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>
To: "Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
	"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
	"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
	"Abdiel Janulgue" <abdiel.janulgue@gmail.com>,
	"Daniel Almeida" <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>,
	"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	"Boqun Feng" <boqun@kernel.org>,
	"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
	"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>,
	"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
	"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
	"Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>
Cc: <driver-core@lists.linux.dev>, <rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] rust: ptr: add panicking index projection variant
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 13:45:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DI3Y41UDFMAX.3M1CRGCMVKT4C@garyguo.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87qzo0r6hu.fsf@t14s.mail-host-address-is-not-set>

On Mon Apr 27, 2026 at 12:24 PM BST, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>> +
>> +    #[inline(always)]
>> +    fn index(self, slice: *mut [T]) -> *mut T {
>> +        // Leverage Rust built-in operators for bounds checking.
>> +        // SAFETY: All non-null and aligned pointers are valid for ZST read.
>> +        unsafe { core::slice::from_raw_parts::<()>(core::ptr::dangling(), slice.len())[self] };
>
> I think this would be more readable if you move the indexing operation
> out of the unsafe block:
>
>         // SAFETY: All non-null and aligned pointers are valid for ZST read.
>         let slice = unsafe { core::slice::from_raw_parts::<()>(core::ptr::dangling(), slice.len()) };
>         // Leverage Rust built-in operators for bounds checking.
>         slice[self];
>
>> +        slice.cast::<T>().wrapping_add(self)
>> +    }
>>  }
>>
>>  // SAFETY: `get`-returned pointer has the same provenance as `slice` and the offset is checked to
>> @@ -100,6 +116,18 @@ fn get(self, slice: *mut [T]) -> Option<*mut [T]> {
>>              new_len,
>>          ))
>>      }
>> +
>> +    #[inline(always)]
>> +    fn index(self, slice: *mut [T]) -> *mut [T] {
>> +        // Leverage Rust built-in operators for bounds checking.
>> +        // SAFETY: All non-null and aligned pointers are valid for ZST read.
>> +        unsafe {
>> +            _ = core::slice::from_raw_parts::<()>(core::ptr::dangling(), slice.len())[self.clone()];
>
> Same comment regarding moving indexing to next line.
>
> Side question: Why do you need to explicitly discard the return value
> here (`_ = ...`) and not above?

Because the result of indexing is a slice, which is unsized.

Best,
Gary

>
>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Andreas Hindborg


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-27 12:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-15 19:57 [PATCH 0/5] Rework index projection syntax Gary Guo
2026-04-15 19:57 ` [PATCH 1/5] rust: ptr: add panicking index projection variant Gary Guo
2026-04-16  7:07   ` Alice Ryhl
2026-04-27 11:24   ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-04-27 12:45     ` Gary Guo [this message]
2026-04-29 11:22   ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-04-29 11:29     ` Gary Guo
2026-04-30 11:23       ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-04-30 11:54         ` Gary Guo
2026-04-15 19:57 ` [PATCH 2/5] rust: dma: update to keyworded index projection syntax Gary Guo
2026-04-16  7:07   ` Alice Ryhl
2026-04-27 11:25   ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-04-29 11:22   ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-04-15 19:57 ` [PATCH 3/5] gpu: nova-core: convert to keyworded " Gary Guo
2026-04-16  7:08   ` Alice Ryhl
2026-04-29 11:22   ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-04-15 19:57 ` [PATCH 4/5] gpu: nova-core: use pointer projection for command queue code Gary Guo
2026-04-16  7:14   ` Alice Ryhl
2026-04-29 11:23   ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-04-15 19:57 ` [PATCH 5/5] rust: ptr: remove implicit index projection syntax Gary Guo
2026-04-16  7:14   ` Alice Ryhl
2026-04-27 11:28   ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-04-29 11:22   ` Alexandre Courbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DI3Y41UDFMAX.3M1CRGCMVKT4C@garyguo.net \
    --to=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
    --cc=abdiel.janulgue@gmail.com \
    --cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lossin@kernel.org \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox