Re: [PATCH 1/2] rust: list: fix SAFETY comment in List::remove

["Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>]

On Mon Apr 27, 2026 at 5:53 PM BST, Christian Benton wrote:
> Hello Phillip,
>
> I am interested in taking this on will do so. I had reached out to Gary about
> his email and asked if he would like me to. I wasn't sure if his email implied
> he was to make the change or was mentioning the idea to me for me to do it. I
> am, however, more than happy to. 

Feel free to pick it up if you want.

Also please wrap your email and use bottom posting
(https://subspace.kernel.org/etiquette.html)

Best,
Gary

>
> Sorry for any confusion on my end.
>
> Christian Benton
>
>
>
> Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
>
> On Friday, April 24th, 2026 at 7:29 AM, Philipp Stanner <phasta@mailbox.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2026-04-07 at 12:56 +0100, Gary Guo wrote:
>> > On Tue Apr 7, 2026 at 9:15 AM BST, Alice Ryhl wrote:
>> > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2026 at 10:08:15PM +0000, Christian Benton wrote:
>> > > > The SAFETY comment for the call to ListLinks::fields in List::remove
>> > > > was left as TODO. Fill it in: the call is safe because T::view_links
>> > > > returns a reference to the ListLinks field of item, and references are
>> > > > always valid and non-dangling.
>> > > >
>> > > > Signed-off-by: Christian Benton <t1bur0n.kernel.org@protonmail.ch>
>> > >
>> > > Thanks. I agree that `item` being a reference is the only thing needed
>> > > for this to be sound, as reference implies that the pointer is not
>> > > dangling.
>> >
>> > (cc Philipp)
>> >
>> > FWIW, I want to change `item` from a reference to a raw pointer.
>> >
>> 
>> Are you still working on that, or should I or someone else pick it up?
>> 
>> Regards
>> P.
>>