From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BB2838B7B1; Tue, 2 Jun 2026 15:03:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780412631; cv=none; b=k2CAhBiMkl5FTU2l0Jw7UQKDNKdGTxCjHidSbS0UtKcHXk/LVFw/0GEuso1yZxUAHobsT2iNt6OzqQYbTpsAc01Zg5kM8zkiMEfFh31295IbbJZEa+/t78z8LWt93htBYgQiT1Afg76dZaTPqkckyte6mCce9csPsJb3tKzblvY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780412631; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8xQkRJaNuQBvap9IdHj5s58Pi1Gs8jwPfEySsq40tGo=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From: References:In-Reply-To; b=Kb2OPT+YCQNXgiW24zGxSqWondkZYQaTpkVXzm5HWCuz2K80ZdubmGjm7iDa+pEgbip2P0ozxI82vtp2wjXrNCJqq20CJ/rXIolJOQFmanBqVLG2LFlGzIEbu9K33SzpJMIEthaCiriDErzM3Tww9aUocyzc1XeYkYxYQOEK4pI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Qnjl7o3c; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Qnjl7o3c" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 99F761F00893; Tue, 2 Jun 2026 15:03:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1780412630; bh=8xQkRJaNuQBvap9IdHj5s58Pi1Gs8jwPfEySsq40tGo=; h=Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:References:In-Reply-To; b=Qnjl7o3cUe6I8eHXYPjAtQLRZpFKinpSSuzG2bGoLcGg+i1l/S+wbF2mnNIAQVeGq +e5h3NYDJLN8SKD7RL2q4j14sbuBK/vTw3ZWZG/JYhuODWC34f+dYbxCZoYEkWxqvI RKCG24HJfGOKauB/7unfdk0j8N7sl5SWagfh5YFfX3cTRAO5cfZRvdvUzGsZ+neUCw LaOXgDi16JbY1VnNttkl6GqT3+0O96cJTDkzkyGfHUy8ld3J+neJ1fJVy+esjgdnbh soBl8ZOeTcVhYnbH3V8pLKQ6/zI0wk1K6b1r6ThttHSrERV7z3yMlq8jzbLVgHyc8g 8NbfiiIAqcmSg== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 17:03:45 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Rework index projection syntax Cc: "Miguel Ojeda" , "Boqun Feng" , =?utf-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Roy_Baron?= , "Benno Lossin" , "Andreas Hindborg" , "Alice Ryhl" , "Trevor Gross" , "Abdiel Janulgue" , "Daniel Almeida" , "Robin Murphy" , "Alexandre Courbot" , "David Airlie" , "Simona Vetter" , , , , , To: "Gary Guo" From: "Danilo Krummrich" References: <20260602-projection-syntax-rework-v2-0-6989470f5440@garyguo.net> In-Reply-To: <20260602-projection-syntax-rework-v2-0-6989470f5440@garyguo.net> On Tue Jun 2, 2026 at 4:17 PM CEST, Gary Guo wrote: > Danilo, we previously discussed merging this series with I/O projection f= or > patch logistics. However, I'll need more time for next version of I/O > projection (implementing view types that have original container type > erased) which won't make it this cycle. This new version for projection > syntax rework is minor changes only comparde to v1, so I think it's worth > sending out so it can still land this cycle and get out of the way. [...] > base-commit: 46def663dd34da36464ba059f7cfeacf29d98e5e Agreed, as discussed; and in this case I think this can go through rust-nex= t. Acked-by: Danilo Krummrich