From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4123D370D77; Sat, 6 Jun 2026 10:45:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780742710; cv=none; b=BhJc46Wss2nL0OoSFJAGbq3cd2rB3jGxQNQs2ZTMcbPXOpuHf4iZedwKCKQq0WIAXHXkZ2wb3spjrgOGQ0mY6s3///HJ93CS9TUBCrSPnhDXhXI/8Cp3Kse40xb8F66GORgrvjEtFfvu4ZVTxSw9lvhyRsdqAUEpjYm3UoAQm4k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780742710; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9cqZO77VTWWktdLqZ0h/mP5IfjZu2eIaSDJRITsDABc=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:To:From:Subject: References:In-Reply-To; b=FQhK6DebcqOPW55ShH5aaIIxLsCESOB+fNSMlshY28CQqwLs2anMz7i8wPWK31y1eUQgX2LNIt4g6dLdKyjMaBScz3auTVMabZzrI86iElQz1Tla6gEr16nxOR5SWWeOpPR0O/s6budhsvjwtp7reokrWz80aUSXEzjaZtf6XNM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=OE3HFwf8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OE3HFwf8" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63D081F00893; Sat, 6 Jun 2026 10:45:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1780742708; bh=9cqZO77VTWWktdLqZ0h/mP5IfjZu2eIaSDJRITsDABc=; h=Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=OE3HFwf88cHJBfTJqX48vhYLfMqcOrMLFOWWXic1y2FVcFxc+izDgqSK6HHjiAk6Q gSXeonuNDEj7qnZCY4RER6fmWDvADBZjA4YGVPW97twmk2tCkb5rXC0BQq1XObInAk EARrsSbXivdzQHQxDP5GOcbKKvoUDfX6NgjwIkghTqO9aGg1LqAQqp26eZhTvRb4oU kOwQefWJPyGh+SDZWF/voDA709ZR74HG8QY04+eb7Vt424k4ZyQuNSHeRJLKwRN/VE Fw0nfgnj3rpocFgdLmSInQBmboUI1hYdvY2lhdpkVX/5tSibTrPOBshr2/BlVkAaq0 q7AL9VIv94Wbg== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2026 12:45:02 +0200 Message-Id: Cc: "Yury Norov" , "Miguel Ojeda" , "Boqun Feng" , "Gary Guo" , =?utf-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Roy_Baron?= , "Benno Lossin" , "Andreas Hindborg" , "Alice Ryhl" , "Trevor Gross" , "Daniel Almeida" , "David Airlie" , "Simona Vetter" , "John Hubbard" , "Alistair Popple" , "Timur Tabi" , "Zhi Wang" , "Eliot Courtney" , , , , , "Yury Norov" , "Joel Fernandes" To: "Alexandre Courbot" From: "Danilo Krummrich" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] rust: add `bitfield!` macro References: <20260527-bitfield-v4-0-e8821d4efbde@nvidia.com> In-Reply-To: <20260527-bitfield-v4-0-e8821d4efbde@nvidia.com> On Wed May 27, 2026 at 2:51 PM CEST, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > This version is based on `rust-next`, with [2] applied. If review proves > satisfying, the merge path with the least friction seems to be patches > 1-3 into the rust tree this cycle, followed by patch 4 through the I/O > tree, and patches 5-6 via the DRM tree during the next cycle. Patch 7 > can be merged after [2]. Would be great if all of this can go through rust-next this cycle. Acked-by: Danilo Krummrich